Assignment: Longitudinal Evaluation

Assignment: Longitudinal Evaluation
ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: Assignment: Longitudinal Evaluation  
Assignment: Longitudinal Evaluation
You have requested “on-the-fly” machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Longer documents can take a while to translate. Rather than keep you waiting, we have only translated the first few paragraphs. Click the button below if you want to translate the rest of the document.
Translate All
Copyright Professor Despina Sapountzi – Krepia Publisher of the International Journal of Caring Sciences Jan/Apr 2017
Adams, M.H., Stover, L.M. & Whitlow, J.F. (1999). A longitudinal evaluation of baccalaureate nursing students’ critical thinking abilities. J Nurs Educ. 38 (3), 139-141.
Akkus, Y., Kaplan, F. & Kacar, N. (2010). The critical thinking levels of nursing students, of Kars health higher school and influencing factors. Firat Health Care Journal. 15(5), 103-111. Turkish.
Atar, N.Y. & Asti, T.A. (2012). Validity and reliability of turkish version of the caring nursepatient interaction scale. I.U.F.N. Hem. Journal. 20, 129-139. Turkish.
Ay, F.A. (2011). Criticism in health care professionals. Basic concepts and skills in health care applicationsIstanbul, 2. Press. Nobel Medical Bookstores, p. 106-115. In Turkish.
Beser, A. & Kissal, A. (2009). Critical thinking dispositions and problem solving skills among nursing students. DEUHYO ED. 2(3), 88-94. Turkish.
Bulut, S., Ertem, G. & Sevil, U. (2009). Examination of nursing students’ level of critical thinking. Deuhyo Ed. 2 (2), 27-38. In Turkish.
Cho, H.S. (2005). A study on the critical thinking disposition and clinical competency of nursing students. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ. 11, 22231.
Colucciello, M.L. (1999). Relationships between critical thinking dispositions and learning styles. J Prof Nurs. 15, 294-301.
Cossette, S., Cote, J.K., Pepin, J., Ricard, N. & D’Aoust, L.X. (2006). A dimensional structure of nurse-patient interactions from a caring perspective: refinement of the caring nurse-patient interaction scale (CNPI-Short Scale). J Adv Nurs. 55(2), 198-214.
Cossette, S., Pepin, J., Cote’, J.K. & De Courval, F.P. (2008). The multidimensionality of caring: A confirmatory factor analysis of the Caring NursePatient Interaction Short Scale. J Adv Nurs. 61(6), 699-710.
Cossette, S., Cara, C., Ricard, N. & Pepin, J. (2005). Assessing nurse-patient interactions from a caring perspective:report of the development and preliminary psychometric testing of the Caring Nurse-Patient Interactions Scale. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 42, 673-686).
Dil, S. & Oz, F. (2005). Factors affecting the ability of the nursing high school and nutrition and dietetics students to think critically. Zonguldak Health High School Journal 1(1), 12-25. In Turkish.
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 50
:

Order Now

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!

Related posts

New Technologies in Nursing

New Technologies in Nursing New Technologies in Nursing Introduction The current nursing technologies have transformed how nurses conduct their duties. Evidently, such technologies and new healthcare systems have endured establishing better services to patients. According to the reports of...