NRS 433 wk 2 Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations template
NRS 433 wk 2 Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations template
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
Your Name
Grand Canyon University
Date:
BUY PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
You will pick two of your approved qualitative studies for this assignment. Please make sure you read my feedback because if I told you that the article was not approved, then you will get a zero for this assignment if you use it.
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
This is your introduction. Please tell the reader about your topic of interest. Explain why you are interested in researching this topic. Please include your PICO question so the reader can follow your purpose of the articles you selected.
Title and Author(s) of Article 1
Background Article 1
Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. In a qualitative study, the researchers are often looking for knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs. Often knowledge, attitude and beliefs lead to noncompliance or errors. Sometimes if we better understand people we can take better care of them.. How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem. Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims. List research questions that the study was designed to answer- these are not the questions that the researcher asked the participants. NRS 433 wk 2 Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations template. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers. Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem? Be sure to include your textbook by citing what your book says about how the problem, purpose and questions are all related! This is essential because without scholarly support you are giving your opinion.
Title and Author(s) of Article 2
Background Article 2
Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. In a qualitative study, the researchers are often looking for knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs. Often knowledge, attitude and beliefs lead to noncompliance or errors. Sometimes if we better understand people we can take better care of them.. How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem. Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims. List research questions that the study was designed to answer- these are not the questions that the researcher asked the participants. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers. Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem? Be sure to include your textbook by citing what your book says about how the problem, purpose and questions are all related! This is essential because without scholarly support you are giving your opinion. NRS 433 wk 2 Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations template
Relationship to Nursing Practice
Explain how each of your two articles will be used to answer your PICO question and how interventions and comparison groups in the articles relate to those in your PICO question
Method of Study- Article 1
Was the study phenomenological, ethnographic, grounded, narrative, or case study? Use your textbook to explain the type of study you believe the study to be. Sometimes it is written and sometimes it is assumed by the research question and purpose. Describe the sample population; was it adequate and appropriate for the study? What does your book say about population sample size? What data collection tools were used? How did the researchers sort the data? How were results analyzed? How was bias controlled?
There is always a review of the literature section. Find the section and see what types of literature the authors read to get foundation for this study. In the review of the literature did the author cite quantitative and qualitative studies relevant to the focus of the study? Are the references current? What does your textbook author say about articles older than 5 years for quantitative and qualitative studies? Did the literature review include adequate information to build a logical argument? NRS 433 wk 2 Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations template
Method of Study- Article 2
Was the study phenomenological, ethnographic, grounded, narrative, or case study? Use your textbook to explain the type of study you believe the study is. Sometimes it is written and sometimes it is assumed by the research question and purpose. Describe the sample population; was it adequate and appropriate for the study? What does your book say about population sample size? What data collection tools were used? How did the researchers sort the data? How were results analyzed? How was bias controlled?
There is always a review of the literature section. Find the section and see what types of literature the authors read to get foundation for this study. In the review of the literature did the author cite quantitative and qualitative studies relevant to the focus of the study? Are the references current? What does your textbook author say about articles older than 5 years for quantitative and qualitative studies? Did the literature review include adequate information to build a logical argument?
Combined Results of the Studies
Summarize key findings of each study in two comprehensive paragraphs. Please make sure you include implications of the two studies to nursing practice. NRS 433 wk 2 Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations template
Ethical Considerations
Discuss how the researchers in your two studies ensured ethical considerations while conducting the research. Discuss two ethical considerations in conducting research. What did your book state as imperative in protecting participants?
Conclusion
Restate your PICO and make connection between your PICO and the qualitative studies. Make sure to emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement, provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice. Also, incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice. Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned. NRS 433 wk 2 Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations template
References
YOUR ARTICLES (PLUS YOUR BOOK)
Green, S. & Johnson, J. (n.d.). Research ethics and evaluation of qualitative research in Helbig, J. (n.d.) History and process of nursing research, evidence-based nursing practice and quantitative and qualitative research. From: https://lc.gcumedia.com/nrs433v/nursing-research-understanding-methods-for-best-practice/v1.1/#/chapter/2 NRS 433 wk 2 Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations template
Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!
