Table of Contents
NR-506: Health Care Policy and Leadership Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide
NR-506: Health Care Policy and Leadership Course Description
Contact Hours: Lecture – 48, Lab – 0, Clinical – 0
Semester Hours: Theory 3
Students explore healthcare policy and advanced practice leadership as it impacts nursing, consumers and systems from institutional to global spheres. Students, as advocates, propose healthcare policies that reflect person-centered care and population health needs. The development, analysis and consequence of healthcare policies, leadership models and ethical and legal decision-making are examined within the context of social, ethical and regulatory issues.
Prerequisites: NR-500NP or NR-500, NR-501NP or NR-501, or NR-512, NR-599.
NOTE: NP-designated course for Nurse Practitioner track students only.
NR-506: Health Care Policy and Leadership Course Syllabus
NR-506 Week 1 Assignment, Identification of Healthcare Policy (Privacy in Public for Nursing Mothers)
NR-506 Week 1 Assignment, Identification of Healthcare Policy (Styrofoam)
NR-506 Week 1 Discussion, The Four Spheres of Political Action in Nursing
NR-506 Week 2 Assignment, Identification of Healthcare Policy Concern (Poverty and its effects on Healthcare)
NR-506 Week 2 Assignment, Identification of Healthcare Policy Concern (Sex Education)
NR-506 Week 2 Assignment, Identification of Healthcare Policy Concern (Old Age Care)
NR-506 Week 2 Assignment, Identification of Healthcare Policy Concern (Obesity)
NR-506 Week 2 Discussion, Policy Priority Selection (Two Responses)
NR-506 Week 3 Discussion, Effective Coalition Leadership
NR-506 Week 4 Assignment, Preparation of Presentation for Elected Official (Sex Education)
NR-506 Week 4 Assignment, Preparation of Presentation to Elected Official (Elderly Care)
NR-506 Week 4 Assignment, Preparation of Presentation to Elected Official (Privacy for Breastfeeding Mothers in Public)
NR-506 Week 4 Assignment, Preparation of Presentation to Elected official (Styrofoam)
NR-506 Week 4 Assignment, Preparation of Presentation to Elected Official (Poverty)
NR-506 Week 4 Discussion, Challenges in Lobbying Strategies
NR-506 Week 5 Discussion, Drivers for High Performance Healthcare (03 Responses)
NR-506 Week 6 Discussion, Using the Media (02 Responses)
NR-506 Week 7 Assignment, Summary of Healthcare Concern Presentation (Poverty)
NR-506 Week 7 Assignment, Summary of Healthcare Concern Presentation (School Nutrition)
NR-506 Week 7 Assignment, Summary of Healthcare Concern Presentation (Sex Education)
NR-506 Week 7 Assignment, Summary of Healthcare Concern Presentation (Banning Styrofoam)
NR-506 Week 7 Discussion, RN as Healthcare Policy Leader
NR-506 Week 8 Discussion, Global Policy Reform
For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!
Syllabus Overview
| Course Number: | NR506 |
| Course Title: | Healthcare Policy |
| Course Credits: | 3 credits |
| Prerequisite: | None |
Course Description
In this course, the student will explore topics related to healthcare policy, including the processes involved in the development of healthcare policy and the analysis of the components and consequences of policies currently impacting nursing, consumers, and the healthcare system. The forces responsible for current healthcare policies will be examined, including historical, ethical, and political factors. Current policy-related controversies and challenges to healthcare policies are also examined. Students investigate and propose strategies that nurses employ to impact policy development at institutional, local, national, and international levels.
Textbooks and Resources
Required Textbooks
The following books are required for this course:
Mason, D. J., Gardner, D. B., Outlaw, F. H., & O’Grady, E. T. (Eds). (2016). Policy & politics in nursing and healthcare (7th ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com
Teitelbaum, J. & Wilensky, S. (2017 ). Essentials of health policy and law (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https://online.vitalsource.com
American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Optional Textbooks
The following books are required for this course:
eBook Details
First Time Using VitalSource?
Step 1: View the VitalSource Video
Step 2: Register with VitalSource Bookshelf Online
- Click the cover or title of your eBook. A new window will open.
- Enter email address and password. Bookshelf Online will open.
Step 3: Access the Desktop and Mobile Versions
You must complete Step 2 prior to using the desktop or mobile versions.
Already Registered? 3 Ways to Access Your eBooks
Online
Access your eBook by clicking on the book cover or title in the syllabus page. Bookshelf Online will open.
Desktop
Download your eBooks and use them whether you’re connected to the Internet or not.
Mobile
Download the app and get your eBooks on your iPhone, iPad, or Android device.
Textbooks and Resources
Required Textbooks
The following books are required for this course:
.
The following book is required across all FNP courses:
American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
The following book is recommended across all FNP courses:
Goroll, A. H., & Mulley, A. G. (2014). Primary care medicine: Office evaluation and management of the adult patient (7th ed.). China: Wolters Kluwer.
You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on NR-507: Advanced Pathophysiology Course Assignments & Discussions.
Physical Books and Supplies
To obtain all your books and supplies, visit the online Chamberlain bookstore at https://bookstore.chamberlain.edu/.
Program Outcomes
Program Outcomes of Chamberlain nursing programs can be found in the Program Descriptions section of your College Catalog. You can access your College Catalog at http://www.chamberlain.edu/msncatalog.
The MSN program outcomes are aligned with the American Association of Colleges of Nursing publication, The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing (2011). Upon completion of the MSN degree program, the graduate will be able to:
- Practice safe, high-quality advanced nursing care based on concepts and knowledge from nursing and related disciplines.
- Construct processes for leading and promoting quality improvement and safety in advanced nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
- Use contemporary communication modalities effectively in advanced nursing roles.
- Evaluate the design, implementation and outcomes of strategies developed to meet healthcare needs.
- Develop a plan for lifelong personal and professional growth that integrates professional values regarding scholarship, service and global engagement.
- Apply legal, ethical and human-caring principles to situations in advanced nursing practice.
- Design patient-centered care models and delivery systems using the best available scientific evidence.
- Manage human, fiscal and physical resources to achieve and support individual and organizational goals.
- Compose a plan for systematic inquiry and dissemination of findings to support advanced nursing practice, patient-care innovation, and the nursing profession.
- Collaborate interprofessionally in research, education, practice, health policy and leadership to improve population health outcomes.
- Apply principles of informatics to manage data and information in order to support effective decision making.
NR-506: Health Care Policy and Leadership Course: A Comprehensive Guide
- NR 506 Week 7 Discussion: APNs as Healthcare Policy Leaders
This week, we’ll talk about how NR 506Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs) may be influential policymakers in the healthcare system. Learn how they impacted the making of health policy and its execution.
- NR 506 Week 8 Reflection on Achievement of Outcomes
Take some time to think on everything you’ve learned and accomplished in NR 506 so far. Reflect on the means through which the course objectives have been met and their relevance to your professional development.
- NR 506 Week 6 Discussion: Scope of Practice and Patient’s Healthcare Accessibility
Explore how the boundaries of a doctor’s or nurse’s practice affect patients’ ability to get the treatment they need. Consider how various policy options could affect patient outcomes.
- NR 506 Week 5 Discussion: Ethical and Legal Implications
Investigate the moral and legal questions that healthcare policy raise. NR 506Discuss in depth the challenges of reconciling individual patient needs with public health goals.
- NR 506 Week 4 Assignment: Health Policy Analysis Presentation
As part of this task, you will evaluate a specific health policy in depth. Showcase your research and proposed changes to the policy.
- NR 506 Week 3 Assignment: Quality Healthcare: Measuring NP Performance
Gain insight into how NR 506Nurse Practitioners (NPs) are evaluated on the quality of care they provide. Analyze the procedures and instruments currently utilized for evaluating students.
- NR 506 Week 2 Assignment plus Graded Discussion Topic
Finish your report on the effects of organizational shifts and ethical/legal considerations on NR 506APRN practice. Participate in a peer-reviewed conversation and exchange ideas.
- NR 506 Week 1 Discussion: Barriers to Practice
Determine the challenges faced by advanced practice nurses and suggest possible solutions. Create and share creative content while also NR 506 discussing it with other users.
- NR 506 Discussion Questions Week 1 – 8
Get involved in weekly discussion questions that foster critical thinking on various healthcare policy topics.
- NR 506 Course Assignments Week 3, 4, 7, & 8
To further your learning, explore the collection of assignments for NR 506weeks 3, 4, 7, and 8.
- NR 506 Entire Course Week 1 – 8
For a thorough understanding of health care policy, access the whole course material from NR 506 weeks 1 to 8.
- NR 506 Week 7 Assignment plus Discussion
Discuss policy issues and the School Health Based Clinic (SHBC) in both the NR 506 week 7 assignment and associated discussions.
- NR 506 Week 7 Assignment: Policy Concern Presentation – School Health Based Clinic (SHBC)
Create a policy-focused presentation on the NR 506 school-based health clinic and give it.
- NR 506 Week 4 Assignment: Health Policy Analysis Presentation
Conduct in-depth research on health policy and provide an engaging presentation to back up your results.
- NR 506 Week 2 Discussion:
NR 506 Case Study on Organizational Change and Legal and Ethical Influences in Advanced Practice Nursing Through case studies, take part in stimulating conversations on organizational change and the ethical-legal effects on advanced practice nursing. Enroll in NR 506 Health Care Policy (Updated 2023) to learn everything there is to know about the creation, analysis, and effects of healthcare policy on advanced nursing practice. To explore through particular themes and take part in insightful conversations and projects, use the available subheadings.
FAQs
Question: The FNP knows that during an abdominal assessment, deep palpation is used to determine
Answer: Deep palpation detects deeper lumps or organ enlargement during an abdominal evaluation. It lets the FNP evaluate organ size, shape, and consistency and find anomalies or soreness that light palpation may miss. Deep palpation evaluates the liver, spleen, kidneys, and bladder with gentle but strong pressure.
Question: The FNP is assessing the abdomen of an aging adult. Which of these statements regarding an aging adult and abdominal assessment is true?
Answer Changes in elderly adults can affect abdominal assessment. The abdomen may relax due to decreased abdominal muscular tone. Palpating abdominal tumors or anomalies is difficult due to abdominal muscular relaxation. Aging adults may have less fat cushioning, making abdominal organs more visible and palpable. The FNP must consider these age-related changes while assessing an aging adult’s abdomen.
Course Outcomes
Chamberlain College of Nursing courses are built to align course content with specific Course Outcomes (COs). The COs define the learning objectives that the student will be required to comprehend and demonstrate by course completion. The COs that will be covered in detail each week can be found in the Overview page in that particular week. Whenever possible, a reference will be made from a particular assignment or discussion back to the CO that it emphasizes.
Upon completion of this course, the student will be able to do the following.
- Analyze application of theories to the development of policies that affect nursing and healthcare. (PO 9, 10)
- Employ strategies to affect the development, implementation, and consequences of policies at the institutional, local, national, and international levels. (PO 4, 8, 10)
- Communicate with policy-makers to advocate for effective policies that affect nurses and nursing, consumers, or the healthcare system. (PO 2, 3, 10)
- Analyze the historical, ethical, and political contexts of healthcare policy and the consequences of policy implementation. (PO 6, 10)
- Advocate for institutional, local, national, and international policies that influence healthcare and its consumers and nurses and their nursing practice. (PO 2, 10)
- Investigate the interrelationship between policy decisions and evidence-based practice. (PO 4, 7, 10)
Course Schedule
| Week, COs, and Topics | Readings | Assignments |
| Week 1
CO 1 & 4 Policymaking, Healthcare and Professional Nursing |
Mason, D. J., Gardner, D. B., Outlaw, F. H., & O’Grady, E. T. (Eds). (2016). Policy & politics in nursing and healthcare (7th ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com
Gambardella, L.C. (2011). Nursing and politics: Strange bedfellows or compatible partners in practice? Building a passion for political action. Nursing News, 35(2), 13. link to article Nault, D.S. (2012). Nurses and public policy. The Michigan Nurse, 85(1), 13-20. link to article |
Homework (not graded, but required)
Graded Discussion Topics |
| Week 2
CO 2 Policy Making Process: How Nurses Can Make an Impact |
Mason, D. J., Gardner, D. B., Outlaw, F. H., & O’Grady, E. T. (Eds). (2016). Policy & politics in nursing and healthcare (7th ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com
Teitelbaum, J. & Wilensky, S. (2017 ). Essentials of health policy and law (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https://online.vitalsource.com
Mebane, F. & Blendon, R. (2001). Political strategy 101: How to make health policy and influence political people. Journal of Child Neurology, 16(7), 513-519. link to article |
Homework (not graded, but required)
Graded Discussion Topics |
| Week 3
CO 5, 6 Determining Healthcare Policy Priorities |
Mason, D. J., Gardner, D. B., Outlaw, F. H., & O’Grady, E. T. (Eds). (2016). Policy & politics in nursing and healthcare (7th ed.). Retrieved from https://online.vitalsource.com
Teitelbaum, J. & Wilensky, S. (2017 ). Essentials of health policy and law (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https://online.vitalsource.com
Goodman, T. (2014). The future of nursing: An opportunity for advocacy. AORN Journal, 99(6), 668-671 doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2014.03.004 Nannini, A. & Crocker, S. (2010). Translating evidence from systematic reviews for policy makers. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 36(6), 22-26. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20100504-02. link to ariticle |
Your Policy-Priority Issue (This assignment must be submitted to Turnitin)
Homework (not graded, but required)
Graded Discussion Topics |
| Week 4
CO 2, 3 Overview of Legislation and Regulation: Communication and Lobbying Process |
Mason, D. J., Gardner, D. B., Outlaw, F. H., & O’Grady, E. T. (Eds). (2016). Policy & politics in nursing and healthcare (7th ed.). Retrieved from https://online.vitalsource.com
Laxalt, N. (2009). Can you hear me now? Guidelines for effective communication with legislators. Nevada Information, 18(1), 10. link to article Stewart, M. & Deaton, L. (2014). United our voices can make a difference. Pelican News, 70(3), 6. link to article |
Homework (not graded, but required)
Graded Discussion Topics |
| Week 5
CO 2, 4, 5 Healthcare Policy in the United States: Influencing the Process at Every Level |
Mason, D. J., Gardner, D. B., Outlaw, F. H., & O’Grady, E. T. (Eds). (2016). Policy & politics in nursing and healthcare (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com
Teitelbaum, J. & Wilensky, S. (2017 ). Essentials of health policy and law (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https:online.vitalsource.com
Blumenthal, D., Abrams, M., Nuzum, R. (2015). The Affordable Care Act at 5 Years. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372, 2451-2458. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr1503614. link to article Buerhaus, P. I. (2010). Healthcare payment reform: Implications for nurses. Nursing Economics, 28(1), 49–54. link to article Gardenier, D. (2012). Can clinical nurse practitioners be involved in policy making? The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 8(3), 198-199. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2012.01.008 link to article Hughes, A. (n.d). The challenge of contributing to policy making in primary care: the gendered experiences and strategies of nurses. Sociology Of Health & Illness, 32(7), 977-992. link to article Strech, S. & Wyatt, D. (2013). Partnering to lead change: Nurses’ role in the redesign of healthcare, AORN, 98(3), 260-266. link to article |
Planning your Visit:
Planning Your Visit (Part A) Planning Your Visit-Public Talk Video (Part B) Homework (not graded, but required)
Graded Discussion Topics |
| Week 6
CO 2, 4, 5 Professional Development and Social Media in Healthcare Policy |
Mason, D. J., Gardner, D. B., Outlaw, F. H., & O’Grady, E. T. (Eds). (2016). Policy & politics in nursing and healthcare (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com
Gardner, D. (2014). Dismantle or improve ObamaCare? Nurses must take action. Nursing Economics, 32(6), 323-326. link to article |
Homework (not graded, but required)
Graded Discussion Topics |
| Week 7
CO 2 Leadership and Contemporary Nursing Strategies in Promoting Healthcare Policy |
Mason, D. J., Gardner, D. B., Outlaw, F. H., & O’Grady, E. T. (Eds). (2016). Policy & politics in nursing and healthcare (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com
Auerbach, J. 2015. Creating a diversified portfolio of population health measures within payment and healthcare reform. American Journal of Public Health, 105(3) : 427-431. link to article Doody O. and Doody, C. (2012). Transformational leadership in nursing practice, British Journal of Nursing, 21(20): 1212-1218. link to article Freudenberg, N. & Tusi, E. (2014). Evidence, power, and policy change in community-based participatory research. American Journal of Public Health, 104(1), 11-14 doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301471. link to article HealthForum. (2015). Population health: a look at the strategy and impact of consumerism. Hospital & Health Networks, 9(89): 47-57. link to article Butterfield, P. 2002 (yes I know it is old but this is a classic) Upstream reflections on environmental health: an abbreviated history and framework for action. Advanced Nursing Science, 25(1) 32-49. link to article Laderman, M. & Whittington, J. (2015). Assessing community health needs. Healthcare Executive, SEPT/OCT: 70-73. link to article |
Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation
Homework (not graded, but required)
Graded Discussion Topics |
| Week 8
CO 5 Advocacy in the International Community |
Mason, D. J., Gardner, D. B., Outlaw, F. H., & O’Grady, E. T. (Eds). (2016). Policy & politics in nursing and healthcare (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com
Kohl, H.W., Craig, C. L., Lambert, E.V., Inoue, S., Alkandari, J.R., Leetonngin, G., Farrer, L., Marinetti, C., Cavaco, Y., Costongs, C. (2015). Advocacy for health equity: A synthesis review. The Milbank Quarterly 93(2) 392-437. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.121122-4. link to article McMichael, A.J., Globalization, climate change, and human health. (2013). New England Journal of Medicine, 368, 1335-1343. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1109341. link to article Meetoo, D. (2013). The setting of healthcare priorities through public engagement. British Journal of Nursing, 22(7), 372-376. link to article |
Graded Discussion Topic |
Late Assignment Policy
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.
In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.
This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.
Evaluation Methods
The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.
| Graded Item | Points | Weighting |
| Discussion (50 points, Weeks 1–7; 25 points, Week 8) |
375 | 37.5% |
| Your Policy-Priority Issue (due Week 3) |
175 | 17.5% |
| Planning Your Visit Part A (due Week 5) |
100 | 10% |
| Planning Your Visit – Public Talk Video Part B (due Week 5) |
75 | 7.5% |
| Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation (due Week 7) |
275 | 27.5% |
| Total | 1,000 | 100% |
No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.
All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.
| Letter Grade | Points | Percentage |
| A | 940–1,000 | 94% to 100% |
| A- | 920–939 | 92% to 93% |
| B+ | 890–919 | 89% to 91% |
| B | 860–889 | 86% to 88% |
| B- | 840–859 | 84% to 85% |
| C+ | 810–839 | 81% to 83% |
| C | 760–809 | 76% to 80% |
| F | 759 and below | 75% and below |
NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.
Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.
Participation for MSN
Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.
Participation Guidelines
Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.
Direct Quotes
Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.
Grading Rubric Guidelines
| Performance Category | 10 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
| Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Performance Category | 10 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
| Application of Course Knowledge –
Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
|
|
|
|
|
| Performance Category | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Interactive Dialogue
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. (5 points possible per graded thread) |
|
Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. |
|
|
|
| Minus 1 Point | Minus 2 Point | Minus 3 Point | Minus 4 Point | Minus 5 Point | |
| Grammar, Syntax, APA
Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 points lost | -5 points lost | ||||
| Total Participation Requirements
per discussion thread |
The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. | The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days | |||
| Early Participation Requirement
per discussion thread |
The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. | The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT. |
NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.
Participation for MSN
The Threaded Discussion Grading Grid and Rubric document can be found in Course Resources.
Participation Guidelines
Due Date: First initial posting to the required threaded discussion topic is due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. Peer and instructor responses are due by Sunday 11:59 pm MT. All posts for week 8 are due by the close of class on Wednesday 11:59 pm MT. Please note that the late assignment policy does not apply to the threaded discussions.
Total Points Possible: Varies with course, please see specific course syllabus. These guidelines are for a required threaded discussion worth 50 points. Please note that week 8 will be worth only 25 points.
Requirements:
Description of the Assignment
- Initial posting: This is defined to be the initial post in which the student responds to the required threaded discussion topic. The first posting by a student within the required discussion area is considered to be the initial posting and will be evaluated using the rubric criteria. Scholarship in communication is expected. Required scholarly source(s) provide specific information that thoroughly address the required topic. For the initial posting, one scholarly source must be presented. The scholarly source must be an outside source. The student may use the required course textbook (s), assigned readings and lesson information in the initial post; however, these are not considered outside scholarly sources.
The initial posting must occur before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. Initial postings must be at a minimum of 300 words. References do not apply toward word count. ONLY in Week 8, the initial posting must be a minimum of 200 words with a scholarly reference. It remains due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT
- Peer responses: As part of the threaded discussion requirements, the student must provide a substantive response to a peer. Substantive responses pose new ideas, ask questions, and/or generally add to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive way.
The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting and instructor response (see below). This peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. This response does not require a scholarly reference unless information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes are used, then APA guidelines apply. Peer responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.
- Instructor response: The student must respond to an instructor’s follow-up questions. The instructor’s question may be directed to the student or may be a question directed to another student in the section. The response must be comprehensive and scholarly in nature. Instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.
The response to the instructor must occur on a day different from the initial post and a day different from the peer response. Responses to the instructor must occur before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
- For week 8 only:Students are expected to post a peer response or an instructor post but are not required to do both. These posts must be a minimum of 100 words. References do not apply toward word count. The peer or instructor response must be on a different day than the initial post and must occur before Wednesday, 11:50 pm MT due to the shorter week.
Posting Requirements:
- The initial posting must be provided before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
- The initial posting must have at least one scholarly outside source that is cited within the posting and referenced. Required course textbooks, assigned readings and lesson information are not considered to be outside scholarly sources.
- Initial posting must be a minimum of 300 words; peer responses and instructor responses a minimum 150 words.
- The peer responses and instructor responses must be provided before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
- All postings are substantive and relate to the graded threaded discussion topic.
- Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is accepted.
- Postings must occur on 3 separate days.
- For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT
Criteria for Content
- Scholarliness: In this category, the student will conduct a search of the current databases and locate valid, relevant, and reliable information for the required topic. Each reference must be scholarly.
- Application of Course Knowledge: In this category, the student demonstrates the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge, and information learned in the course lesson and outside readings. This information is then applied to a real-life professional situation as an example.
- Interactive Dialogue: In this category, the minimum requirements are to provide an initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. In addition, one peer response and one instructor response are required. These postings must be completed by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. The initial posting, peer response, and instructor response must be on 3 separate days.
- Grammar, Syntax, APA: Proper grammar, APA, and syntax is required for all posts. Students should follow the APA Manual 6th Edition. Additional APA information is available in Course Resources.
- Participation Requirement: One initial posting, one peer response and one instructor response (for a total of 3 posts for the week) are required on 3 separate days.
- Participation Deadline: The student must provide a substantive response to the graded threaded discussion topic. This must be posted by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. Peer and instructor responses must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
- For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
- Instructor reserves the right to submit any threaded discussion posting to TurnItIn in order to verify the originality.
- When journals are used as the outside source of information, it is preferred that the journal be peer reviewed. The Chamberlain online librarian is very helpful in assisting you to find an article related to your topic. If you have questions concerning scholarly sources, please refer to the handout entitled “What is a scholarly source” located under “Course Resources” tab.
- Web sites vary in quality and scholarship. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarly nature of the web site. If the instructor determines that the site failed to demonstrate scholarship, points maybe deducted. Students are cautioned to use care regarding .com sites. Some .com sites are excellent such as American Heart Association, but others are built by individuals and scholarliness is lacking. It is recommended that you check with your instructor before using a .com website as a reference.
- Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is acceptable. It is expected that the student will paraphrase the information when presenting information from a scholarly source. The scholarly source(s) for the paraphrased information must be cited using APA format. Do not include a number of small quotes even if they are just a few words as your instructor considers a quote to be a quote no matter its limited size.
Grading Rubric
| Performance Category | 100% or highest level of performance
100% 16 points |
Very good or high level of performance
88% 14 points |
Acceptable level of performance
81% 13 points |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68% 11 points |
Deficient level of performance
56% 9 points
|
Failing level
of performance 55% or less 0 points |
| Total Points Possible= 50 | 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
| Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
| 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points | |
| Application of Course Knowledge
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
|
| 10 Points | 9 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points | |||
| Interactive Dialogue
Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
| 8 Points | 7 Points | 6 Points | 5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
| Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
| 0 Points Deducted | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Participation
Requirements |
Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
| 0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Due Date Requirements | Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
||||
|
Grading Rubric Guidelines Week 8 ONLY |
||||||
| Performance Category | 100% or highest level of performance
100% |
Very good or high level of performance
88% |
Acceptable level of performance
81% |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68% |
Deficient level of performance
56% |
Failing level of performance
55% or less |
| 8 Points | 7 Points | 6 Points | 5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
| Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
| 8 Points | 7 Points | 6 Points | 5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
| Application of Course Knowledge –
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic. |
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic. |
| Interactive Dialogue
For Week 8 only: Initial post should be a minimum of 200 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 100 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
| 4 Points | 3 Points | 2 Points | 0 Points | |||
| Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
||
| 0 Points | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Participation Requirements | For Week 8 ONLY:
Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
| 0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Requirements | For Week 8 ONLY:
Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer or one instructor response is to be posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
|
||||
NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 pm MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 pm MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 pm MT Wednesday of the eighth week.
*Scholarly source: Per the APA Guidelines in Course Resources, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments and threaded discussions. These include peer reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Your textbook and lesson are not considered to be an outside scholarly source. For the discussions, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available data bases for a peer reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These web sites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site that you are unsure of. If the instructor determines that the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality, points will be deducted for not using scholarly sources. Current outside scholarly sources are required for the initial posting. This is defined to be 5 years or less. Instructor permission must be obtained if using a source that is older than 5 years.
Participation for MSN
Participation Guidelines
The weekly case study discussion is worth up to 100 points. Students are expected to participate a minimum of four times (once in part one by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, once in part two by Thursday, 11:59 p.m. MT, once in part three by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, and one post to a student peer as required in the interactive dialogue criterion).
Grading Rubric
| Criteria | A
Outstanding or highest level of performance |
B
Very good or high level of performance |
C
Competent or satisfactory level of performance |
F
Poor or failing unsatisfactory level of performance |
| Total Points Possible= 100 | ||||
| 25 Points | 20 Points | 15 Points | 0 Points | |
| Application of Course Knowledge | Post contributes unique perspectives or insights consistent with current standards of practice applicable to the results from the case study. | Post contributes unique perspectives or insights, but may be lacking some applicability to the case presentation. | Post has limited perspectives or insights and limited application to case presentation. | Post perspectives are not consistent with current practice. |
| 25 Points | 20 Points | 15 Points | 0 Points | |
| Support from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) | Discussion posts are supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last 5 years. In-text citations and full references are provided. | Discussion posts partially supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last 5 years.
In-text citations and full references are provided. Evidence-based, peer reviewed journal article cited but may not fully support the discussion. |
Discussion posts partially supported by evidence.
Sources may not be scholarly in nature or may be older than 5 years. In-text citations and/or full references may be incomplete or missing. |
Citations to non-scholarly websites given as rationale to support differential diagnoses and/or treatment plan. No evidence-based, peer reviewed journal article cited. |
| 25 Points | 20 Points | 15 Points | 0 Points | |
| Organization | Post presents case study findings in a logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence; clearly relevant to topic. | Post presents case study findings and plan or intervention that is sometimes unclear to follow, though relevant to topic. | Post presents case findings and plan or intervention that are sometimes unclear to follow and may not always be relevant to topic. | Post is not relevant to discussion question. |
| 25 Points | 20 Points | 15 Points | 0 Points | |
| Interactive Dialogue | Presents findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a student peer and respond to all faculty questions posted by Thursday. A substantive post adds content or insights to the discussion and is supported by references and citations as appropriate. | Presents findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a student peer. Responds to some faculty questions posted by Thursday. | Responds to a student peer and/or faculty, but the nature of the response is not substantive. | Does not respond to a topic-related peer post. Does not respond to faculty questions posted by Thursday. |
| 0 Points Deducted | 8 Points Deducted | 9 Points Deducted | 10 Points Deducted | |
| Grammar, Syntax, APA
(Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing) |
APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to three errors. | Four to six errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation noted | Seven to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are noted | Post contains greater than nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation. |
| 0 Points Deducted | – 5 Points per Discussion Part | |||
| Participation
Enters first post to part one by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday; First post to part two by 11:59 p.m. MT on Thursday. *5 points deducted per discussion part if this criteria is not met. |
Enters first post to part one by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday; first post to part two by 11:59 p.m. MT on Thursday; and submits written summation by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT. | *5 points deducted per discussion part if this criteria is not met. |
Webliography Disclaimer
The purpose of the Webliography is to provide students with annotated bibliographies of world wide websites relevant to their courses. These websites are not meant to be all inclusive of what is available for each course’s subjects and have not been sanctioned as academically rigorous or scholarly by Chamberlain College of Nursing. Please exercise caution when using these websites for course assignments and references.
NR-506: Health Care Policy and Leadership Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide
Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 1 Discussion The Four Spheres of Political Action in Nursing NEW
The Four Spheres of Political Action in Nursing Please discuss the four spheres of political action in nursing.
Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 2 Discussion Policy Priority Selection NEW
Policy-Priority SelectionIdentify your selected healthcare policy priority and discuss the rationale for your selection. Describe the model of policy making that you feel would be best applied to your policy issue and the rationale for selecting this modePolicy-Priority
Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership NEW
Effective Coalition Leadership. Describe the various elements necessary for effective leadership within a coalition. How does this apply to your professional practice or life?
Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue ( Bicycle Helmet Policy ) NEW
Your Policy Priority Issue Guidelines and Grading RubricPurposeThe purpose of this assignment is to: a) identify and reflect upon key concepts related to your planning a policymaker call b) provide empirical evidence to support new insights gained regarding your healthcare policy issue and the policymaking process, and c) present ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner.Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:(CO#1) Analyze application of theories to the development of policies that affect nursing and health care. (PO 9, 10)(CO#3) Communicate with policymakers to advocate for effective policies that affect nurses and nursing, consumers, or the health care system. (PO 2, 3, 10)(CO#4) Analyze the historical, ethical, and political contexts of healthcare policy and the consequences of policy implementation. (PO 6, 10)(CO#6) Investigate the interrelationship between policy decisions and evidence-based practice. (PO4, 7, 10)Due DateSunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3Total Points:175 pointsRequirementsAssignment Criteria for Presentation:1. Provide an introduction to your healthcare policy-priorityissue and the title or name of your legislator.2. Articulate key points under each of the Formulating a Healthcare Policy Ungraded Worksheet #1 sections.3. Provide a critique of empirical evidence that supports your chosen healthcare policy-priority issue and analysis.4. Demonstrate the importance and impact of the chosen healthcare policy-priority issue to nursing.5. Provide concluding statements summarizingthe content.6. The paper will be a minimum of 4 pages and a maximum offive pages in length,in APA format 6th edition,excluding the title and reference page.Preparing the PaperAfter completing Formulating a Healthcare Policy Ungraded Worksheet #1, address all areas on the worksheet in the body of a scholarly paper. Include a minimum of five (5) classic or current references published within the past 5 years.Category Points % DescriptionIntroduction and Conclusion 35 20 Introduction clearly introduces your healthcare policy- priority issue and the title or name of your designated legislator.Concluding statements summarizing content.Key Points 40 23 Identification of all key points of your healthcare policy-priority issue (review sections of Healthcare Policy Ungraded Worksheet) are clearly analyzed and fully articulated.Empirical Evidence 40 23 Provide a critique of empirical evidence thatsupports your chosen healthcare policy issue and analysis.Impact and Importance to Nursing 35 20 Demonstrate the importance and impact of the chosen healthcare policy issue to nursing.APA Format 10 6 Text, title page, and references are consistent with APA format.Writing Quality 15 8 Rules of grammar, word usage, sentence, and paragraph format and punctuation.Total 175 100 A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.Grading RubricAssignment Criteria Exceptional(100%)Outstanding or highest level of performance Exceeds(88%)Very good or high level of performance Meets(80%)Competent or satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement(38%)Poor or failing level of performance Developing(0)Unsatisfactory level of performanceContentPossible Points = 150 PointsIntroduction clearly introduces your healthcare policy-priority issue. Concluding statements summarizing content are present.35 Points 31 Points 28 Points 13 Points 0 PointsIntroduction clearly introduces your healthcare policy-priority issue and the title or name of your designated legislator. Concluding statements summarizing content are present, clear, and well written.Introduction introduces your healthcare policy-priority issue and the name or title of your designated legislator. Concluding statements summarizing content are present. Minor clarity or detail issues.Introduction and conclusion are included; could include more details such as a specific healthcare policy-priority issue that a legislator could act upon or the name or title of the legislator; clarity or improvement of format.Lacking introduction or conclusion.No attempt made at introduction or conclusion.Identification of all key points of your healthcare policy-priority issue are clearly analyzed and fully articulated.40 Points 35 Points 32 Points 15 Points 0 PointsKey points are well described, and analysis is fully articulated.Key points are described with some lack of clarity, and/or analysis is lacking detail or clarity.Key points are not well described, and/or analysis is lacking detail or clarity.Key points or analysis is missing.Key points and analysis is missing.Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy-priority issue is clearly critiqued.40 Points 35 Points 32 Points 15 Points 0 PointsEmpirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy- priority issue is clearly critiqued in a comprehensive and accurate manner.Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy- priority issue is critiqued but lacking clarity or not substantive.Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy- priority issue is noted but not critiqued.Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy priority issue is lacking.No attempt made at providing empirical evidence.Your healthcare policy- priority issue clearly demonstrates the impact and or importance of your issue to nursing or the intended impact to patient outcomes.35 Points 31 Points 28 Points 13 Points 0 PointsImpact to patient outcomes or nursing practice is thoroughly discussed.Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice has rare inaccuracy.Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice lacks occasional important elements or specificity.Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice has multiple instances of inaccuracies.Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice has multiple instances of inaccuracies and is vague.Content Subtotal_____of 150 pointsFormat Possible Points = 25 PointsAPA Format: Text, title page, and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format 6thedition.10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 PointsPaper is free from APA errors throughout.There are 1-2 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s) There are 3-4 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s) There are 5 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s) There are 6 or more APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s)Writing Quality: Paper is appropriate in length. References include a minimum of 5 scholarly references excluding the course text. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work.15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 PointsPaper is appropriate in length. References include more than the minimum number of scholarly references, excluding the course text. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work.Paper is short/long in length and/or contains a minimum of scholarly references excluding course text, or references utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with1-2 exceptions.Paper is short/long in length and contains only 1 scholarly reference. Additional references are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with 3-4 exceptions.Paper is short/long two or more pages in length and does not contain scholarly references. References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are not followed with 5 errors.Paper is short/long two or more pages in length and does not contain scholarly references. References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are not followed with 6 or more errors.
Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 5 Discussion Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems NEW
Drivers of High Performance Healthcare SystemsSelect two drivers (for example quality, cost, and access) of high performance healthcare systems and apply it to your current work situation. The application could demonstrate the presence of the driver in a positive manner or it could acknowledge the presence of a concern.Levels of Government Involved in Healthcare Policy MakingReview the assigned article for this Week, Buerhaus, P. I. (2010). Healthcare payment reform: Implications for nurses. Nursing Economics, 28(1), 49–54.An emerging political issue is to change the way healthcare providers are compensated to control healthcare spending. Nurses are the largest group of healthcare providers and can make the greatest impact on the healthcare system. Compare and contrast two advantages versus the disadvantages of the policy to disentangle nursing costs from the patient room charges and/or organization charges. How can this policy affect your policy priority? Is there evidence?
Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 5 Planning Your Visit (Part A) NEW
Planning Your Visit(Part A)Guidelines and Grading RubricPurposeThe purpose of this assignment is to: (a) identify communication strategies that support an effective policy making-presentation/visit(CO #2);(b) deliver a message andmake recommendations (CO #2,3), and (c) communicate ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner. (CO#3)Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:(CO #2) Employ strategies to affect the development, implementation, and consequences of policies at the institutional, local, national, and international levels. (PO 4, 8, 10)(CO #3) Communicate with policymakers to advocate for effective policies that affect nurses and nursing, consumers, or the health care system. (PO 2,3,10)(CO #4) Analyze the historical, ethical, and political contexts of health care policy and the consequences of policy implementation. (PO 6, 10)(CO #5) Advocate for institutional, local, national, and international policies that influence health care and its consumers and nurses and their nursing practice. (PO2,10)Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 5Total Points: 100pointsRequirementsAssignment Criteria for Presentation1. Introduce your chosen policy issue, the current status, and an overview of your plan for a legislative visit.2. Articulate key communication strategies involved in your approach to the legislator including plan, message, and recommendations; see Worksheet 2 and again, the focus is on evidence-based communication techniques for effective healthcare policy visit to the legislator.3. Provide an analysis of empirical evidence of effective communication strategies and techniques to support an effective visit and follow-up to the legislator.4. Provide specific examples of the impact and/or importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing.5. Provide concluding statements summarizingthe content.6. Paper will be 2-3 pages, excluding title and reference pages, and in APA format 6thedition.7. Five non-text book references are required as minimum.Preparing the PaperFollowing completion of Planning Your Visit Ungraded Worksheet 2, target communication strategies that support an effective policymaking visit. Include a minimum of five (5) classic references or current references (published within the past 5 years) that support your policy plan, the message, recommendations, and follow-up.Category Points % DescriptionIntroduction and Conclusion 10 10 Introductionbriefly identifies your healthcare policy-priority issue, the policy itself and legislator with a plan for the policymaker visit/presentation. Concluding statements summarize content.Empirical Evidence 50 50 Empirical evidence identifies effective communication strategies and techniqueswith follow-up supporting your visit to the legislator.Specific Examples 20 20 Provide specific examples of the impact and/or importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing.APA Format 10 10 Text, title page, and references are consistent with APA format 6thedition.Writing Quality 10 10 Rules of grammar, word usage, sentence and paragraph format, and punctuation are followed. Paper length appropriate.Total 100 100 A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.Grading RubricAssignment Criteria Exceptional(100%)Outstanding or highest level of performance Exceeds(88%)Very good or high level of performance Meets(80%)Competent or satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement(38%)Poor or failing level of performance Developing(0)Unsatisfactory level of performanceContentPossible Points = 100 PointsIntroduction and Conclusion 10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 PointsIntroduction briefly identifiesyour healthcare/policy-priority issue, policy itself, and legislator with a plan for the policymaker visit/presentation.Concluding statements summarizing content have no inaccuracy.Introduction of your healthcare/policy-priority issue, policy itself, and legislatorwith a plan for policymaker visit/presentation has rare inaccuracy.Concluding statements lack occasional important element or specificity.Introduction of your healthcare/policy-priority issue, policy itself, and legislator with a plan for policymaker visit/presentation lacks occasional important element or specificity.Concluding statements lack occasional important element or specificity.Introduction of your healthcare/policy-priority issue, policy itself and legislator with a plan for a policymaker visit/presentation has multiple instances of inaccuracies or is lacking content.Concluding statements have multiple instances of inaccuracies or lacks content.No attempt at introduction or conclusion.Empirical Evidence 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 PointsEmpirical evidence ofeffective communication strategies and techniques with follow-up supporting your healthcare policy-priority visit to the legislator is clearly articulated.Empirical evidence ofeffective communication strategies and techniques with follow-up supporting your healthcare policy-priority visit to the legislator has a few inaccuracies.Empirical evidence ofeffective communication strategies and techniques with follow-up supporting your healthcare policy-priority visit to the legislator has multiple instances of inaccuracies or lacks detail/articulation.Empirical evidence of effective communication strategies and techniques with follow-up supporting your healthcare policy-priority visit to the legislator is missing.No attempt at providing Empirical evidence.Specific Examples 20 Points 18 Points 16 Points 8 Points 0 PointsProvides specific examples of the impact and/or importance of a successful visit/presentationto nursing and has no inaccuracy and is clearly articulated.Provides specific examples of the impact and/or importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing and lacks occasional important elements or specificity and/or lacks clarity.Provides specific examples of the impact and/or importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing and has multiple instances of inaccuracies and/or lacks clarity.No specific examples of the impact OR importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing.No specific examples of the impact AND importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing.Content Subtotal_____of80 pointsFormat Possible Points = 20 PointsAPA Format: 10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 PointsText, title page, and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format.There are 1–2 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s).There are 3–4 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s).There are 5 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s).There are 6 or more APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s).Writing Quality.10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 PointsPaper is appropriate in length. References include the minimum of five (5) scholarly references,excluding the course text.Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work.Paper is short or long in length and/or contains fewer than 5 but more than 1 scholarly reference, excluding course text, or references utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with1–2 exceptions.Paper is short or long in length and contains only 1 scholarly reference. Additional references are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with 3–4 exceptions.Paper is two or more pages short or long in length and does not contain scholarly references. References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are not followed with 5 errors Paper is two or more pages short or long in length and does not contain scholarly references. References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are not followed with 6 or more errors.Format Subtotal_____of 20 pointsTotal Points_____of 100 points
Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 6 Discussion Using the Media NEW
Using the MediaGiven the power of the media, discuss how you would use an opinion editorial, a personal interview, websites, texting, Facebook, Twitter, and/or blogs to influence public opinion relative to your policy priority. What issues about media and electronic social networking do you need to consider? Why?
Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader NEW
RN as Healthcare Policy LeaderAs a health policy professional leader, communicating with lay audiences is an important skill in promoting the health of the community for master prepared registered nurses. Develop a concise position statement reflecting the research findings and recommendations by experts as they relate to workplace support for breast feeding mothers, medical marijuana services in the community, genetic testing or applications of stem cell research, transgender care, abortion, end-of-life care, or a community service administered by Family Nurse Practitioners (if you pick this one be specific about the type of community service the FNP would work in or manage).Population Based CareFind an article that describes holistic care of a client with a chronic illness. As a leader in healthcare policy, what additional healthcare policy changes would you advocate for to improve the health of this population?
Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 7 Policymaker Electronic Presentation NEW
Policymaker Electronic PresentationGuidelines and Grading RubricPurposeThe purpose of this assignment is to: (a) identify and reflect upon key concepts related to your policymaker visit (CO #3); (b) provide empirical evidence to support new insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policymaking process (CO #6); and (c) present ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner (CO #3).Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:(CO#1) Analyze application of theories to the development of policies that affect nursing and health care. (PO 9, 10)(CO#3) Communicate with policymakers to advocate for effective policies that affect nurses and nursing, consumers, or the health care system. (PO 2,3, 10)(CO#6) Investigate the interrelationship between policy decisions and evidence-based practice. (PO 4, 7 10)Due Date:Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7Total Points:275 pointsRequirementsAssignment Criteria for Presentation1. Describe your visit/presentation, including any PowerPoint presentation materials that you utilizedduring your policymaker visit. Limit these slides to five slides in this project (of the 15 total slides). This includes any handouts that you left with the policymaker.2. Discuss the response of the policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s).3. Reflect on the process, follow-up plans, insights gained about the issue and process, and support with evidence.4. Describe possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.5. Provide concluding statements summarizingthe content.6. Develop a 15-slide PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes in APA format, not including title and reference slides. Write speaker notes sufficient enough to enable someone to take over or give the presentation other than you.Preparing the PresentationAfter completing Policymaker Visit Ungraded Worksheet 3, develop an electronic presentation to describe, analyze, and reflect upon your policymaking visit. Include 5 slides from thePowerPoint presentation that you would have used during an actual policymaker visit. Include a minimum of five (5) classic or current references within the past 5 years that specifically support insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policymaking process.Category Points % DescriptionVisit Description 50 18 Clearly describes the policymaking visit/presentation (includes no more than 5 slides from actual presentation)Policymaker Response 50 18 Slides and speaker notes discuss responses of policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s).Reflections on Process 50 18 Reflections on process (including supportive evidence), follow-up, and insights gained (issue and process) are clearly described in slide and speaker notes.Future Opportunities 50 18 Describe possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting/presentation and their importance to nursing.Conclusions 45 16 Concluding statements summarize content.APA format 15 6 Slides, speaker notes, and references are completely consistent with APA format.Presentation/Writing 15 6 Slide and speaker notes content are accurate.Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone.Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Balance among space, words/graphics, and color is effective.Total 275 100 A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.Grading RubricAssignment Criteria Exceptional(100%)Outstanding or highest level of performance Exceeds(88%)Very good or high level of performance Meets(80%)Competent or satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement(38%)Poor or failing level of performance Developing(0)Unsatisfactory level of performanceContentPossible Points = 245 PointsVisit Description 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 PointsClearly describes the policymaking visit/presentation (includes actual presentation) Description of visit/presentation has rare inaccuracy.Description of visit/presentation lacks occasional important element or specificity.Description of visit/presentation has multiple instances of inaccuracies or is not addressed Does not identify, define or describe the healthcare policy..Policymaker Response 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 PointsSlides and speaker notes discuss response of policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s) and is clearly articulated.Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has rare inaccuracy.Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response occasionally inaccurate or lacks occasional important elements or specificity.Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has multiple inaccuracies or lacks sufficient level of detail.Slides and speaker notes do not discuss the policymaker response.Reflections on Process 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 PointsReflections on process (including supportive evidence), follow-up,and insights gained (issue and process) are clearly described in slide and speaker notes.Reflection on process, supportive evidence, follow-up, and insights gained has rare inaccuracy within slides and speaker notes.Occasionally inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks occasional important elements or specificity.Reflection on process, evidence, follow-up, and insights is inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks sufficient detail.There is no reflection on process.Future Opportunities 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 PointsClearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.Describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing with need for further detail or clarity.Clearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting but no mention of importance to nursing.Minimal description of possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and no Discussion of importance to nursing.Does not describe possible future opportunities or their importance to nursing.Conclusion 45 Points 40 Points 36 Points 0 PointsConcluding statements summarize content in a clear and articulated manner.Concluding statements summarizing content have rare inaccuracy or lack of minor details/clarity.Concluding statements lack occasional important element or specificity.Concluding statements have multiple instances of inaccuracies or little detail.No conclusion.Content Subtotal _____of 245 pointsFormatPossible Points = 30 PointsAPA format 15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 PointsSlides, speaker notes, and references are completely are free from APA errors throughout.There are 2-3 APA format errors.There are 4-6 APA format errors.There are 6-7 APA format errors.Eight or more errors in APA, grammar, spelling and syntax and/or citations are missingPresentation/Writing 15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 PointsSlide and speaker notes content are accurate.Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Balance among space, words/graphics, and color is effective.Presentations slides are professional in appearance and tone with rare exceptions.Slides are+1 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content with rare repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack minor detail or clarity.Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone with occasional areas needing improvements in style.Slides are+2 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content with occasional repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack detail or clarity.Most presentation slides are not professional in appearance and tone with numerous areas needing improvements in style.Slides are+3 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content withmultiple repetitions of slides or lack significant detail.Presentation includes numerous crowded slides and has no flow.Format Subtotal _____of 30 pointsTotal Points _____of 275 points
Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 7 Policymaker Electronic Presentation (Vaccination Rates for Children in Ingham County, Michigan) NEW
Policymaker Electronic PresentationGuidelines and Grading RubricPurposeThe purpose of this assignment is to: (a) identify and reflect upon key concepts related to your policymaker visit (CO #3); (b) provide empirical evidence to support new insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policymaking process (CO #6); and (c) present ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner (CO #3).Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:(CO#1) Analyze application of theories to the development of policies that affect nursing and health care. (PO 9, 10)(CO#3) Communicate with policymakers to advocate for effective policies that affect nurses and nursing, consumers, or the health care system. (PO 2,3, 10)(CO#6) Investigate the interrelationship between policy decisions and evidence-based practice. (PO 4, 7 10)Due Date:Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7Total Points:275 pointsRequirementsAssignment Criteria for Presentation1. Describe your visit/presentation, including any PowerPoint presentation materials that you utilizedduring your policymaker visit. Limit these slides to five slides in this project (of the 15 total slides). This includes any handouts that you left with the policymaker.2. Discuss the response of the policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s).3. Reflect on the process, follow-up plans, insights gained about the issue and process, and support with evidence.4. Describe possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.5. Provide concluding statements summarizingthe content.6. Develop a 15-slide PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes in APA format, not including title and reference slides. Write speaker notes sufficient enough to enable someone to take over or give the presentation other than you.Preparing the PresentationAfter completing Policymaker Visit Ungraded Worksheet 3, develop an electronic presentation to describe, analyze, and reflect upon your policymaking visit. Include 5 slides from thePowerPoint presentation that you would have used during an actual policymaker visit. Include a minimum of five (5) classic or current references within the past 5 years that specifically support insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policymaking process.Category Points % DescriptionVisit Description 50 18 Clearly describes the policymaking visit/presentation (includes no more than 5 slides from actual presentation)Policymaker Response 50 18 Slides and speaker notes discuss responses of policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s).Reflections on Process 50 18 Reflections on process (including supportive evidence), follow-up, and insights gained (issue and process) are clearly described in slide and speaker notes.Future Opportunities 50 18 Describe possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting/presentation and their importance to nursing.Conclusions 45 16 Concluding statements summarize content.APA format 15 6 Slides, speaker notes, and references are completely consistent with APA format.Presentation/Writing 15 6 Slide and speaker notes content are accurate.Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone.Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Balance among space, words/graphics, and color is effective.Total 275 100 A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.Grading RubricAssignment Criteria Exceptional(100%)Outstanding or highest level of performance Exceeds(88%)Very good or high level of performance Meets(80%)Competent or satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement(38%)Poor or failing level of performance Developing(0)Unsatisfactory level of performanceContentPossible Points = 245 PointsVisit Description 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 PointsClearly describes the policymaking visit/presentation (includes actual presentation) Description of visit/presentation has rare inaccuracy.Description of visit/presentation lacks occasional important element or specificity.Description of visit/presentation has multiple instances of inaccuracies or is not addressed Does not identify, define or describe the healthcare policy..Policymaker Response 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 PointsSlides and speaker notes discuss response of policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s) and is clearly articulated.Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has rare inaccuracy.Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response occasionally inaccurate or lacks occasional important elements or specificity.Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has multiple inaccuracies or lacks sufficient level of detail.Slides and speaker notes do not discuss the policymaker response.Reflections on Process 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 PointsReflections on process (including supportive evidence), follow-up,and insights gained (issue and process) are clearly described in slide and speaker notes.Reflection on process, supportive evidence, follow-up, and insights gained has rare inaccuracy within slides and speaker notes.Occasionally inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks occasional important elements or specificity.Reflection on process, evidence, follow-up, and insights is inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks sufficient detail.There is no reflection on process.Future Opportunities 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 PointsClearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.Describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing with need for further detail or clarity.Clearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting but no mention of importance to nursing.Minimal description of possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and no Discussion of importance to nursing.Does not describe possible future opportunities or their importance to nursing.Conclusion 45 Points 40 Points 36 Points 0 PointsConcluding statements summarize content in a clear and articulated manner.Concluding statements summarizing content have rare inaccuracy or lack of minor details/clarity.Concluding statements lack occasional important element or specificity.Concluding statements have multiple instances of inaccuracies or little detail.No conclusion.Content Subtotal _____of 245 pointsFormatPossible Points = 30 PointsAPA format 15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 PointsSlides, speaker notes, and references are completely are free from APA errors throughout.There are 2-3 APA format errors.There are 4-6 APA format errors.There are 6-7 APA format errors.Eight or more errors in APA, grammar, spelling and syntax and/or citations are missingPresentation/Writing 15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 PointsSlide and speaker notes content are accurate.Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Balance among space, words/graphics, and color is effective.Presentations slides are professional in appearance and tone with rare exceptions.Slides are+1 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content with rare repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack minor detail or clarity.Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone with occasional areas needing improvements in style.Slides are+2 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content with occasional repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack detail or clarity.Most presentation slides are not professional in appearance and tone with numerous areas needing improvements in style.Slides are+3 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content withmultiple repetitions of slides or lack significant detail.Presentation includes numerous crowded slides and has no flow.Format Subtotal _____of 30 pointsTotal Points _____of 275 points
Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 8 Discussion Global Policy Reform NEW
Global Policy ReformReflect on the concepts and practices you have learned in NR 506 on healthcare systems, politics, and health policy. Read the article that is linked below and share insights as how to make informed decisions on nursing practice and patient outcomes on a global basis. In addition, state how you will apply what you have learned in this course to your upcoming practicum experience. Note: it is welcome but not necessary to post your own references this Week in your Discussion responses. Enjoy the reading and simply reflect with us.Read the.proquest.com.proxy.chamberlain.edu/docview/1029876233?accountid=147674″>articleby Kohl, H.W., Craig, C. L., Lambert, E.V., Inoue, S., Alkandari, J.R., Leetonngin, G., Kahlmeier, K. (2012), a systems approach to dealing with the global issue of physical inactivity is discussed.Your Policy Priority Issue Guidelines and Grading RubricPurposeThe purpose of this assignment is to: a) identify and reflect upon key concepts related to your planning a policymaker call b) provide empirical evidence to support new insights gained regarding your healthcare policy issue and the policymaking process, and c) present ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner.Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:(CO#1) Analyze application of theories to the development of policies that affect nursing and health care. (PO 9, 10)(CO#3) Communicate with policymakers to advocate for effective policies that affect nurses and nursing, consumers, or the health care system. (PO 2, 3, 10)(CO#4) Analyze the historical, ethical, and political contexts of healthcare policy and the consequences of policy implementation. (PO 6, 10)(CO#6) Investigate the interrelationship between policy decisions and evidence-based practice. (PO4, 7, 10)Due DateSunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3Total Points:175 pointsRequirementsAssignment Criteria for Presentation:1. Provide an introduction to your healthcare policy-priorityissue and the title or name of your legislator.2. Articulate key points under each of the Formulating a Healthcare Policy Ungraded Worksheet #1 sections.3. Provide a critique of empirical evidence that supports your chosen healthcare policy-priority issue and analysis.4. Demonstrate the importance and impact of the chosen healthcare policy-priority issue to nursing.5. Provide concluding statements summarizingthe content.6. The paper will be a minimum of 4 pages and a maximum offive pages in length,in APA format 6th edition,excluding the title and reference page.Preparing the PaperAfter completing Formulating a Healthcare Policy Ungraded Worksheet #1, address all areas on the worksheet in the body of a scholarly paper. Include a minimum of five (5) classic or current references published within the past 5 years.Category Points % DescriptionIntroduction and Conclusion 35 20 Introduction clearly introduces your healthcare policy- priority issue and the title or name of your designated legislator.Concluding statements summarizing content.Key Points 40 23 Identification of all key points of your healthcare policy-priority issue (review sections of Healthcare Policy Ungraded Worksheet) are clearly analyzed and fully articulated.Empirical Evidence 40 23 Provide a critique of empirical evidence thatsupports your chosen healthcare policy issue and analysis.Impact and Importance to Nursing 35 20 Demonstrate the importance and impact of the chosen healthcare policy issue to nursing.APA Format 10 6 Text, title page, and references are consistent with APA format.Writing Quality 15 8 Rules of grammar, word usage, sentence, and paragraph format and punctuation.Total 175 100 A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.Grading RubricAssignment Criteria Exceptional(100%)Outstanding or highest level of performance Exceeds(88%)Very good or high level of performance Meets(80%)Competent or satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement(38%)Poor or failing level of performance Developing(0)Unsatisfactory level of performanceContentPossible Points = 150 PointsIntroduction clearly introduces your healthcare policy-priority issue. Concluding statements summarizing content are present.35 Points 31 Points 28 Points 13 Points 0 PointsIntroduction clearly introduces your healthcare policy-priority issue and the title or name of your designated legislator. Concluding statements summarizing content are present, clear, and well written.Introduction introduces your healthcare policy-priority issue and the name or title of your designated legislator. Concluding statements summarizing content are present. Minor clarity or detail issues.Introduction and conclusion are included; could include more details such as a specific healthcare policy-priority issue that a legislator could act upon or the name or title of the legislator; clarity or improvement of format.Lacking introduction or conclusion.No attempt made at introduction or conclusion.Identification of all key points of your healthcare policy-priority issue are clearly analyzed and fully articulated.40 Points 35 Points 32 Points 15 Points 0 PointsKey points are well described, and analysis is fully articulated.Key points are described with some lack of clarity, and/or analysis is lacking detail or clarity.Key points are not well described, and/or analysis is lacking detail or clarity.Key points or analysis is missing.Key points and analysis is missing.Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy-priority issue is clearly critiqued.40 Points 35 Points 32 Points 15 Points 0 PointsEmpirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy- priority issue is clearly critiqued in a comprehensive and accurate manner.Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy- priority issue is critiqued but lacking clarity or not substantive.Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy- priority issue is noted but not critiqued.Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy priority issue is lacking.No attempt made at providing empirical evidence.Your healthcare policy- priority issue clearly demonstrates the impact and or importance of your issue to nursing or the intended impact to patient outcomes.35 Points 31 Points 28 Points 13 Points 0 PointsImpact to patient outcomes or nursing practice is thoroughly discussed.Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice has rare inaccuracy.Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice lacks occasional important elements or specificity.Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice has multiple instances of inaccuracies.Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice has multiple instances of inaccuracies and is vague.Content Subtotal_____of 150 pointsFormat Possible Points = 25 PointsAPA Format: Text, title page, and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format 6thedition.10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 PointsPaper is free from APA errors throughout.There are 1-2 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s) There are 3-4 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s) There are 5 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s) There are 6 or more APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s)Writing Quality: Paper is appropriate in length. References include a minimum of 5 scholarly references excluding the course text. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work.15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 PointsPaper is appropriate in length. References include more than the minimum number of scholarly references, excluding the course text. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work.Paper is short/long in length and/or contains a minimum of scholarly references excluding course text, or references utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with1-2 exceptions.Paper is short/long in length and contains only 1 scholarly reference. Additional references are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with 3-4 exceptions.Paper is short/long two or more pages in length and does not contain scholarly references. References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are not followed with 5 errors.Paper is short/long two or more pages in length and does not contain scholarly references. References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are not followed with 6 or more errors.
Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!
Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.
Expertise That Sets Us Apart
At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.
Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?
- Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
- Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
- Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
- Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
- Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
- Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.
Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?
Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!
Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey
Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or get professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.
Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!
