Table of Contents
NR-503: Population Health, Epidemiology and Statistical Principles Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide
NR-503 Population Health, Epidemiology and Statistical Principles Course Description
Contact Hours: Lecture – 48, Lab – 0, Clinical – 0
Semester Hours: Theory 3
This course introduces students to advanced practice competencies utilized by advanced practice nurses. These competencies include the utilization of epidemiological and statistical principles to serve as a basis for the assessment, development and implementation of evidence-based interventions for populations. Additional concepts focus on utilizing epidemiology to identify, predict and intervene for risk factors that impact populations.
Prerequisites: NR-500NP or NR-500, NR-501NP or NR-501, NR-505NP or NR-505, NR-506NP, NR-599
NR-503: Population Health, Epidemiology and Statistical Principles Course Syllabus
Syllabus Overview
NR-503 Week 1 Discussion: Exercise and Discussion Questions from Curley Text Book
NR-503 Week 2 Assignment: Healthy People 2020 Impact Paper (3 Versions)
NR-503 Week 2 Discussion: Epidemiological Methods
NR-503 Week 3 Discussion: Epidemiological Methods and Measurements
NR-503 Week 4 MIDTERM (Actual Exam + Study Material)
NR-503 Week 4 Discussion: Open Forum Discussion
NR-503 Week 5 Assignment: Infectious Disease Paper (7 Versions)
NR-503 Week 5 Discussion: Open Forum Discussion
NR-503 Week 6 Assignment: Epidemiological Analysis: Chronic Health Problem (All 5 Topics)
NR-503 Week 6 Discussion: Open Forum Discussion
NR-503 Week 7 Reflection : Reflection on Achievement of Outcomes Concept Map
NR-503 Week 7 Discussion: Global and Environmental Health
NR-503 Week 8 Discussion: Health Policy and Ethics
NR-503 Week 8 FINAL EXAM (Study Guide / Exam / Notes Material)
For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!
| Course Number: | NR503 |
| Course Title: | Population Health, Epidemiology, & Statistical Principles |
| Course Credits: | 3 credits |
| Prerequisite: | NR505 |
Textbooks and Resources
Required Textbooks
The following books are required for this course:
Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (year of publication). Title of textbook in italics (X ed.). City, ST: Publisher.
Information regarding supplementary material, software, etc.
American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Optional Textbooks
The following books are required for this course:
Book Title
Information regarding supplementary material, software, etc.
Physical Books and Supplies
To obtain all your books and supplies, visit the online Chamberlain bookstore at https://bookstore.chamberlain.edu/.
eBook Details
First Time Using VitalSource?
Step 1: View the VitalSource Video
Step 2: Register with VitalSource Bookshelf Online
- Click the cover or title of your eBook. A new window will open.
- Enter email address and password. Bookshelf Online will open.
Step 3: Access the Desktop and Mobile Versions
You must complete Step 2 prior to using the desktop or mobile versions.
You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on NR-504: Leadership and Nursing Practice: Role Development Course Assignments & Discussions.
Already Registered? 3 Ways to Access Your eBooks
Online
Access your eBook by clicking on the book cover or title in the syllabus page. Bookshelf Online will open.
Desktop
Download your eBooks and use them whether you’re connected to the Internet or not.
Mobile
Download the app and get your eBooks on your iPhone, iPad, or Android device.
Textbooks and Resources
Required Textbooks
The following books are required for this course:
Gordis, L. (2014). Epidemiology (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders
The following book is required across all FNP courses:
American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
The following book is recommended across all FNP courses:
Goroll, A. H., & Mulley, A. G. (2014). Primary care medicine: Office evaluation and management of the adult patient (7th ed.). China: Wolters Kluwer.
eBook Details
First Time Using VitalSource?
Step 1: View the VitalSource Video
Step 2: Register with VitalSource Bookshelf Online
- Click the cover or title of your eBook. A new window will open.
- Enter email address and password. Bookshelf Online will open.
Step 3: Access the Desktop and Mobile Versions
You must complete Step 2 prior to using the desktop or mobile versions.
Already Registered? 3 Ways to Access Your eBooks
Online
Access your eBook by clicking on the book cover or title in the syllabus page. Bookshelf Online will open.
Desktop
Download your eBooks and use them whether you’re connected to the Internet or not.
Mobile
Download the app and get your eBooks on your iPhone, iPad, or Android device.
Program Outcomes
Program Outcomes of Chamberlain nursing programs can be found in the Program Descriptions section of your College Catalog. You can access your College Catalog at http://www.chamberlain.edu/msncatalog.
The MSN program outcomes are aligned with the American Association of Colleges of Nursing publication, The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing (2011). Upon completion of the MSN degree program, the graduate will be able to:
- Practice safe, high-quality advanced nursing care based on concepts and knowledge from nursing and related disciplines.
- Construct processes for leading and promoting quality improvement and safety in advanced nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
- Use contemporary communication modalities effectively in advanced nursing roles.
- Evaluate the design, implementation and outcomes of strategies developed to meet healthcare needs.
- Develop a plan for lifelong personal and professional growth that integrates professional values regarding scholarship, service and global engagement.
- Apply legal, ethical and human-caring principles to situations in advanced nursing practice.
- Design patient-centered care models and delivery systems using the best available scientific evidence.
- Manage human, fiscal and physical resources to achieve and support individual and organizational goals.
- Compose a plan for systematic inquiry and dissemination of findings to support advanced nursing practice, patient-care innovation, and the nursing profession.
- Collaborate interprofessionally in research, education, practice, health policy and leadership to improve population health outcomes.
- Apply principles of informatics to manage data and information in order to support effective decision making.
Course Outcomes
Chamberlain College of Nursing courses are built to align course content with specific Course Outcomes (COs). The COs define the learning objectives that the student will be required to comprehend and demonstrate by course completion. The COs that will be covered in detail each week can be found in the Overview page in that particular week. Whenever possible, a reference will be made from a particular assignment or discussion back to the CO that it emphasizes.
Upon completion of this course, the student will be able to do the following.
- Define key terms in epidemiology, community health, and population-based research. (PO 1, 4)
- Compare study designs used for obtaining population health information from surveillance, observation, community, and control trial based research. (PO 1, 4)
- Identify appropriate outcome measures and study designs applicable to epidemiological subfields such as infectious disease, chronic disease, environmental exposures, reproductive health, and genetics. (PO 1, 4, 7)
- Apply commonly used measures of health risk. (PO 1)
- Examine current ethical/legal issues in epidemiology. (PO 6)
- Identify important sources of epidemiological data. (PO 4)
- Evaluate a public health problem in terms of magnitude, person, time, and place. (PO 1, 4)
- Reflect on personal and professional growth toward achieving competence as a family nurse practitioner. (PO 5, 10)
Course Schedule
| Week, CO, and Topics | Readings | Assignments |
| Week 1
CO 1, 6 Epidemiology and Disease |
Gordis, L. (2014). Epidemiology (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders
Websites to visit and investigate this week (please see the course webliography for URL):
|
Key Concepts Worksheet (graded)
Case Study Discussion |
| Week 2
CO 1, 2, 3 Descriptive Epidemiology, Screening, Prevention, and the Importance of the Randomized Control Trial |
Gordis, L. (2014). Epidemiology (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders
To better understand sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value look up this article via the internet: Parikh, B., Mathai, A., Parikh, S., Sekbar, C., & Thomas, R. (2008). Understanding and using sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Indian Journal of Opthamology, 56(1), 45-50 |
Case Study Discussion |
| Week 3
CO 2, 3, & 4 Estimating Risk, Chronic Disease, and Cohort Design |
Gordis, L. (2014). Epidemiology (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders
To understand more on risk check out: The Cochrane Collaboration Comparing Two Groups |
Relative Risk Worksheet (graded)
Case Study Discussion |
| Week 4
CO 2, 3, & 6 Case Control, Comparing Research Designs, and Causation of Disease |
Gordis, L. (2014). Epidemiology (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders
|
Case Study Discussion |
| Week 5
CO 3, 5, 6 Subfields of Epidemiology |
Website exploration:
CDC Surveillance Resource Center – http://www.cdc.gov/surveillancepractice/ CDC Sexually Transmitted Diseases – http://www.cdc.gov/sTD/stats/default.htm Floud, S., Blangiardo, M., Clark, C., Hoogh, K., Babisch, W., Houthuijs, D., & … Hansell, A. L. (2013). Exposure to aircraft and road traffic noise and associations with heart disease and stroke in six European countries: a cross-sectional study. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source, 12(1), 1-23. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-12-89 Hai-Ying, L., Skjetne, E., & Kobernus, M. (2013). Mobile phone tracking: in support of modelling traffic-related air pollution contribution to individual exposure and its implications for public health impact assessment. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source, 12(1), 1-26. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-12-93 Hulme, P. (2010). Cultural considerations in evidence-based practice. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 21, 271–280. Srinivasan, S., O’Fallon, L. R., & Dearry, A. (2003). Creating healthy communities, healthy homes, healthy people: Initiating a research agenda on the built environment and public health. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1146–1150. |
Case Study Discussion |
| Week 6
CO 2, 3, 6, 7 Epidemiology, the Bigger Picture |
Gordis, L. (2014). Epidemiology (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders
Halsey Lea, D., Skirton, H. Read, C. Y., & Williams, J. K. (2011). Implications for educating the next generation of nurses on genetics and genomics in the 21st century. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 43(1), 3–12. Jenkins, J., Grady, P. A., & Collins, F. S. (2005). Nurses and the genomic revolution. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 37(2), 98–101. Zaccai, J. H. (2004). How to assess epidemiological studies. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 80, 140-147 doi:10.1136/pgmj.2003.012633. Retrieved from http://pmj.bmj.com/content/80/941/140.full |
Evaluation of an Epidemiological Disease or Problem Assignment (graded)
Case Study Discussion |
| Week 7
CO 1, 4, 6 Health Services and Health Screening |
Gordis, L. (2014). Epidemiology (5th ed). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders
Chassin, M. R., Loeb, J. M., Schmaltz, S., & Wachter, R. M. (2010). Accountability measures – Using measurement to promote quality improvement. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(7), 683-688. |
FNP Practicum Process (required but not graded)
Case Study Discussion |
| Week 8
CO 5 Health Policy and Ethics |
Gordis, L. (2014). Epidemiology (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders
|
Reflection (required, but not graded) |
Late Assignment Policy
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.
In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.
This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.
Evaluation Methods
The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.
| Graded Item | Points | Weighting |
| Case Study Discussion (100 points/week; Weeks 1–7) | 700 | 70% |
| Key Concepts Worksheet (Week 1) | 50 | 5% |
| Relative Risk Calculation Worksheet (Week 3) | 50 | 5% |
| Evaluation of Epidemiological Problem Paper (Week 6) | 200 | 20% |
| FNP Practicum Process (Week 7- required but not graded) | N/A | N/A |
| Total | 1,000 | 100% |
No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.
All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.
| Letter Grade | Points | Percentage |
| A | 940–1,000 | 94% to 100% |
| A- | 920–939 | 92% to 93% |
| B+ | 890–919 | 89% to 91% |
| B | 860–889 | 86% to 88% |
| B- | 840–859 | 84% to 85% |
| C+ | 810–839 | 81% to 83% |
| C | 760–809 | 76% to 80% |
| F | 759 and below | 75% and below |
NOTE:To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.
Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.
Participation for MSN
Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.
Participation Guidelines
Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.
Direct Quotes
Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.
Grading Rubric Guidelines
| Performance Category | 10 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
| Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Performance Category | 10 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
| Application of Course Knowledge –
Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
|
|
|
|
|
| Performance Category | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Interactive Dialogue
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. (5 points possible per graded thread) |
|
Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. |
|
|
|
| Minus 1 Point | Minus 2 Point | Minus 3 Point | Minus 4 Point | Minus 5 Point | |
| Grammar, Syntax, APA
Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 points lost | -5 points lost | ||||
| Total Participation Requirements
per discussion thread |
The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. | The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days | |||
| Early Participation Requirement
per discussion thread |
The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. | The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT. |
NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.
Participation for MSN
Participation Guidelines
The weekly case study discussion is worth up to 100 points. Students are expected to participate a minimum of four times (once in part one by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, once in part two by Thursday, 11:59 p.m. MT, once in part three by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, and one post to a student peer as required in the interactive dialogue criterion).
Grading Rubric
| Criteria | Exceptional
Outstanding or highest level of performance |
Exceeds
Very good or high level of performance |
Meets
Satisfactory level of performance |
Needs Improvements
Poor or failing level of performance |
Developing
Unsatisfactory level of performance |
| Total Points Possible= 100 | |||||
| 30 Points | 26 Points | 24 Points | 11 Points | 0 Points | |
| Application of Course Knowledge | Student fully answers discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three which contribute unique perspectives and insights, and are applicable to the discussion/case presentation.
|
Student fully answers discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three which contribute unique perspectives and insights, but may be lacking some applicability to the discussion/case presentation.
|
Student fully answers discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three but some responses have limited perspectives and insights, and have limited application to discussion/case presentation, or only two of the three posts have been fully answered.
|
Student fully answers discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three but posts are not consistent with current practice, or only one post has been fully answered.
|
Student does not fully answer discussion questions in all of the parts, or responses offer neither insight, nor application to discussion/case presentation.
|
| 30 Points | 26 Points | 24 Points | 11 Points | 0 Points | |
| Support from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) | All three discussion posts are supported from appropriate sources which are: 1) evidence- based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years *, and; 4) in-text citations and full references are provided.
|
All three discussion posts are from appropriate sources which are: 1) evidence- based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years *, and; 4) in-text citations and full references are provided.
However, evidence-based, peer reviewed journal articles that are cited may not fully support the discussion in any one area. |
Two of the three discussion posts are supported from appropriate sources which are: 1) evidence- based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years *, and; 4) in-text citations and full references are provided. | Only one of the discussion posts are supported from appropriate sources which are: 1) scholarly in nature, 2) published within the last 5 years, and; 3) in-text citations and full references are provided. | Discussion posts One, Two, and Three contain No evidence- based practice references or citations.
*Students should note that factitious sources, sources that are clearly not read by the student and used, or sources that have incorrect dates will result in an automatic ZERO for this section for the week. |
| 10 Points | 9 Points | 8 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
| Organization | Discussion posts One, Two, and Three present case study findings in a logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence. | Discussion posts One, Two, and Three present case study findings which are sometimes unclear to follow.
|
Discussion posts present case findings in a logical and understandable method but One of the discussion parts contain a significant error.
|
Discussion posts are sometimes unclear to follow and/or there are significant errors in Two discussion parts.
|
Discussion posts are Not presented in a logical, understandable sequence and/or there are significant errors in ALL THREE discussion parts. |
| 26 Points | 23 Points | 21 Points | 10 Points | 0 Points | |
| Interactive Dialogue | Presents case study findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a peer including evidence from appropriate sources, and all direct faculty questions posted in parts one, two and three.
A substantive post adds content or insights to the discussion and is supported by references and citations as appropriate.
|
Presents case study findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a peer. Does include evidence from appropriate sources.
Responds to some direct faculty questions posted in parts one, two and three. A substantive post adds content or insights to the discussion and is supported by references and citations as appropriate.
|
Responds to a student peer and/or faculty questions but the posts adds limited content or insights to the discussion.
Does include evidence from appropriate sources
|
Responds to a student peer and/or faculty, but the nature of the response is not substantial.
Does not include evidence from any resources.
|
Does not respond to a topic-related peer post and/or does not respond to faculty questions by Sunday. |
| 4 Points | 3 Points | 2 Points | 1 Point
|
0 Points | |
| Grammar, Syntax, APA | APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one errors. | Two to four errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. | Five to seven errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. | Eight to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. | Post contains greater than ten errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback. |
| 0 Points Deducted | 10% deduction per day for late discussion post
|
33 points deducted per omitted/late discussion part | |||
| Participation
Enters first post to Part One by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday; first post to Part Two by 11:59 p.m. MT on Thursday; and posts Part Three and peer response by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT. |
Enters first post to Part One by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday; first post to Part Two by 11:59 p.m. MT on Thursday; and posts Part Three and peer response by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT. | Ten percent (10%) per day for each late discussion post.
. *See Calculating Late Posting Penalty Document in Course Resources
|
Written submissions will not be accepted after Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of the week they are due.
33 points deducted per part if Part 1 is not posted by Friday 11:59 p.m., Part 2 or 3 is/are not submitted by Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT of the week they are due. |
||
| * Refer to “What is a Scholarly Source” and “Reference Guide for FNP Case Studies” in the “Course Resources” section
** Part Three discussion CLOSES at Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT-deductions will apply once discussion has closed. |
|||||
Webliography Disclaimer
The purpose of the Webliography is to provide students with annotated bibliographies of world wide websites relevant to their courses. These websites are not meant to be all inclusive of what is available for each course’s subjects and have not been sanctioned as academically rigorous or scholarly by Chamberlain College of Nursing. Please exercise caution when using these websites for course assignments and references.
Professional Portfolio
Select assignments from courses across the FNP program will be compiled as artifacts within a Professional Portfolio to demonstrate your professional growth and expertise. Your final portfolio, which will be submitted in the final course NR661, will be assessed against the learning outcomes of the program. The Professional Portfolio will include the following:
- Reflections from Week 8 for all FNP courses
- Five exemplar case studies (student selects top five)
- eLogs portfolio
- Curriculum vitae
- Professional development plan paper from NR510
Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!
Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.
Expertise That Sets Us Apart
At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.
Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?
- Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
- Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
- Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
- Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
- Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
- Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.
Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?
Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!
Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey
Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or get professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.
Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!
