HRM-635 Acquiring, Developing, and Leveraging Human Capital Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

HRM-635 Acquiring, Developing, and Leveraging Human Capital Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

HRM-635 Acquiring, Developing, and Leveraging Human Capital Course Description

The effective strategic management of human capital is the differentiator of every successful organization. This course examines talent management, workforce diversity, succession planning, employee development and motivation, and performance matrix. This course addresses human resource competencies identified by the Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM). Using the strong strategic human resource acumen provided by this course, students will be well-prepared for positions as senior human resources specialists or as general managers.

Class Introductions

Students will make a post familiarizing themselves with peers. They will also identify potential exciting or challenging aspects of the course.

HRM-635 Acquiring, Developing, and Leveraging Human Capital Course Assignments & Discussions Syllabus

Description

HRM635 Topic 2 Discussion 1, Online Recruitment Method

HRM-635 Topic-2 Discussion 2, Reliability and Validity

HRM 635 Week 2 Assignment, Benchmark – Acquiring Employees

HRM635 Topic 3 Discussion 1, Interview Questions

HRM635 Topic 3 Discussion 2, Recruiting and Organization Culture

HRM 635 Week 3 Assignment, Interview Selection Process

HRM-635 Topic 4 Discussion 1, HR Discussion

HRM635 Topic 4 Discussion 2, Formal and Informal Orientation Processes in My Organization

HRM-635 Topic 5 Discussion 1, Engaging Environment

HRM635 Topic 5 Discussion 2, Supporting Employee Development

HRM635 Week 5 Assignment, Training and Development

HRM635 Topic 6 Discussion 1, Appraisals Process to Identify Potential Improvements

HRM-635 Topic 6 Discussion 2, Performance Management System

HRM-635 Week 6 CLC Assignment, Performance Appraisal at Telespazio

HRM635 Topic 7 Discussion 1, Compensation in the Workplace

HRM-635 Topic 7 Discussion 2, Legally Required Benefits

HRM635 Week 7 Assignment, Employee Reward System

HRM635 Topic 8 Discussion 1, HRM Discussion

HRM635 Topic-8 Discussion 2, Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action

HRM-635 Week 8 Assignment, Synopsis on Human Resource Management

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

HRM-635 Acquiring, Developing, and Leveraging Human Capital Course Discussions

Topic 1: The Role of HR in Developing HR-Mindedness

Topic 1 DQ 1

The assignment will conduct research on the community for SHRM. It will first identify the firm’s role and relevance in guiding HR professionals. Further, it will explain the role of SHRM in helping HR officials complete their tasks efficiently and effectively.

Topic 1 DQ 2

Students will reflect on their firm’s HRM status. Then, they will identify elements of an HRM perspective related to the firm’s employees. Again, it will identify elements that enhance strategic HRM while focusing on the whole firm. Lastly, it will describe how the student’s firm accepts HR as a strategic partner.

Topic 2: Job Analysis, Job Descriptions, And Job Competencies

Topic 2 DQ 1

The assessment will identify the firm’s specific websites, procedures, and processes to attract new employees online. Students will also discuss the challenges and benefits of social media when looking for a job opening. They will also identify the drawbacks of using social media to hire new talent and how they can be reduced.

Topic 2 DQ 2

Students will assume they were rejected in a job hire. Then, they will discuss the validity and reliability of the selection and recruitment practices used. In addition, they will explain the relevance of the two factors when choosing an effective hiring method. Finally, they will evaluate the validity and reliability of their firm’s selection and hiring process.

You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on LDR-615 Organizational Development and Change Course Assignments & Discussions.

Topic 3: Recruitment, Selection, And Talent Management

Topic 3 DQ 1

The paper will identify one standard interview question for a specific job position. It will also discuss the rationale behind question development and expected response suggestions.

Topic 3 DQ 2

The assignment will identify pre-employment selection techniques that can be utilized to ascertain if a candidate fits with the company culture. It will also identify the message relayed to candidates in the hiring process of a firm. Lastly, it will clarify how HR officials can eliminate bias in pre-employment assessments.

Topic 4: Training and Development

Topic 4 DQ 1

The students will analyze the firm’s needs, identify skill gaps, and provide resources to support training goals. Then, they will suggest an appropriate training program for their firm. Later, they will explain how the training program aligns with worker’s needs and the firm’s goals. Lastly, they will explain how they determine the effectiveness of a training program.

Topic 4 DQ 2

Students will identify the informal or formal onboarding processes in their firm. They will also identify factors that make the onboarding process effective. Finally, they will suggest implementing changes to make the firm’s onboarding process effective.

Topic 5: Employment Retention and Engagement

Topic 5 DQ 1

The paper will explain the relevance of fostering employee engagement in a firm. It will also provide experiences that can help foster a culture of engagement. Then, it will share a strategy to promote an engaging environment for the firm.

Topic 5 DQ 2

The assessment will explain how the firm’s leadership can support employees seeking to advance their careers within the firm. It will also give an example and explain how the approach could aid employee retention.

Topic 6: Performance Management and Appraisal

Topic 6 DQ 1

The paper will identify the most helpful job analysis component that can aid in developing a performance appraisal tool. It will also identify the most difficult part of the performance management procedure.

Topic 6 DQ 2

In this paper, students will explain the purpose of a performance appraisal tool in aligning with a firm’s strategic goals. They will also discuss the relationship between a performance management procedure and employee growth and development.

Topic 7: Compensation and Benefits Incentives

Topic 7 DQ 1

The paper will identify and explain two elements of the total compensation package that foster a firm’s competitiveness and entice and retain workers.

Topic 7 DQ 2

The assignment will define legally required benefits and their purpose. It will also explain if any of the benefits can be waived. Lastly, it will give an example while adding another benefit that should be included.

Topic 8: Employment Law and Employee Relations

Topic 8 DQ 1

The paper will describe how the Christian worldview affects HR personnel’s job duties and roles. It will also identify ethical and legal responsibilities that Christian employees have in promoting employee beliefs. Further, it will give an example of factors that influence good employee treatment in the workplace.

Topic 8 DQ 2

The paper will ascertain the relevance of various initiatives today. The initiatives include affirmative action, equal employment opportunity, ban the Box, the Genetic Information Non-discrimination Act, and the Family Medical Leave Act. Finally, it will choose the two initiatives mentioned above and provide a detailed explanation and supporting information.

HRM-635 Acquiring, Developing, and Leveraging Human Capital Course Assignments

Topic 1: The Role of HR in Developing HR-Mindedness

Topic 2: Job Analysis, Job Descriptions, and Job Competencies

HRM-635 Benchmark – Acquiring Employees Week 2 Assignment

Description

During this course, you will develop materials that support the human resource process from acquiring, developing, and leveraging on employee strengths. This project is broken into four separate assignments due in Topics 2, 3, 5, and 7. While you are only required to submit each assignment in its respective topic, you will submit a reflection assignment that provides a brief overview of the learning outcomes from your assignment feedback.

In this assignment, you are conducting a needs assessment and developing two job descriptions for your current organization or a preapproved organization that you have access to interact with, in order to complete this assignment. If you are not currently in an organization, please inform your instructor of the organization you will use to complete this project. They must approve your selection prior to beginning your assignment and you must have the ability to observe employees and functions within that organization.

Needs Assessment

Observe and assess the state of your current organization, or another pre-selected organization. A needs assessment is necessary to identify areas for potential growth, both at the employee and organizational level. If you are not in a position to look holistically at your organization, you can focus on a department or team within the organization. Use the “Needs Assessment Matrix” resource to complete your needs assessment. You are required to analyze required functions, department or employment needs, jobs or tasks, and current trainings in order to complete your matrix and prepare for the next part of this assignment.

Job Descriptions

Once your needs assessment is complete, you are required to select an existing position in your organization and develop a one-page detailed job description for that position that is informed by the findings of the need’s assessment. It is recommended that you take the time to conduct a job analysis and observe current employees in the selected positions to accurately depict the knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics that must be incorporated into the job description. If you are unable to observe, do your best to accurately depict the specific functions of the job. Incorporate any new job roles you feel should be added to the position based on your findings. Make sure the job description is based on the needs and available resources of the organization, and that it adheres to all applicable labor laws.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

HRM-635 Benchmark – Acquiring Employees Assignment: Needs Assessment Matrix

Definition: A needs assessment is the process organizations use to determine if training is necessary for its employees.

Note: This template serves as a guide to complete the needs assessment of your current or selected organization. You are allowed to manipulate the categories to obtain the information you require in order to complete the assignment.

Department	Required Functions	Department or Employee Needs	Jobs or Tasks	Current Trainings

 

HRM-635 Benchmark – Acquiring Employees Assignment Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HRM-635	HRM-635-O500	Benchmark – Acquiring Employees	130.0
Criteria	Percentage	Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)	Satisfactory (79.00%)	Good (87.00%)	Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	70.0%
Needs Assessment (MSL: 2.2) (MPA: 2.3)	35.0%	A needs assessment is not included.	A needs assessment is included, but it is incomplete or lacks detail.	A needs assessment is included and the matrix is complete, but the needs assessment minimally addresses areas for potential growth.	A detailed needs assessment is included and the matrix is thorough and complete. The needs assessment addresses areas for potential growth and includes at least one example from each area analyzed.	A comprehensive needs assessment is included and the matrix is well developed. The needs assessment addresses areas for potential growth and includes multiple examples from each area analyzed.
Job Descriptions	35.0%	Two job descriptions are not included.	One or two job descriptions are included, but they are incomplete or lack detail.	Two job descriptions are included. A job analysis is conducted to determine necessary knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics to incorporate in the job descriptions.	Two job descriptions are included and provide details of corporate research conducted during analysis. A thorough job analysis is conducted to determine necessary knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics to incorporate in the job descriptions.	Two job descriptions are included and provide details of corporate research conducted during analysis. A thorough job analysis is conducted to determine necessary knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics to incorporate in the job descriptions. The job descriptions are clear and well developed to appeal to potential candidates.
Organization and Effectiveness	20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing  (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format	10.0%
Paper Format  (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

Topic 3: Recruitment, Selection, and Talent Management

HRM-635 Interview Selection Process Week 3 Assignment

The paper will develop an interview strategy that students deem fit for hiring a diverse pool of qualified candidates in their firm. It should be a 750-1000 word essay that details the hiring process.

Description

Once you have a clear understanding of what your organization needs, it is time to consider the interview process. This assignment is a continuation of the acquiring, developing, and leveraging employee process you have already been working on during this course. The interview process is an important step in hiring the right person for your organization. For this assignment, develop an interview strategy you would consider using to interview and select the right candidate for your organization. You are required to use the job descriptions you developed in the previous assignment. As you are developing your interview strategy, think about testing options that would benefit the interview process. The following must be included in your interview strategy (750-1,000 words):

1. A detailed description of the time, place, format, interview type, and employees involved in the actual interview process.
2. At least one testing option to be included in the selection process. Explain why this testing option is best suited for the selection process.
3. A minimum of four situational and four behavioral interview questions that you would use to interview for both jobs. (Reminder: Use both of the job descriptions from your previous assignment.)

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

HRM-635 Interview Selection Process Week 3 Assignment Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HRM-635	HRM-635-O500	Selection Process	125.0
Criteria	Percentage	Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)	Satisfactory (79.00%)	Good (87.00%)	Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	70.0%
Detailed Description of Interview Process	25.0%	There is no detailed description for the interview process.	A detailed description for the interview process is included, but is incomplete or lacks details.	A detailed description for the interview process is included. The description minimally addresses the requirements according to the assignment.	A detailed description for the interview process is included. The description addresses the requirements according to the assignment with detail and research based on observation conducted.	A thorough description for the interview process is included. The description accurately addresses the requirements for the entire interview process, incorporating research based on observations conducted.
Testing Options	20.0%	There are no testing options included in the interview process.	Testing options are included, but are incomplete or lack details.	One testing option is included in the interview process. There is a minimal explanation for selecting the testing option for the interview process.	Multiple testing options are included in the interview process. There is a detailed explanation for selecting the testing options for the interview process.	Multiple testing options are included with a detailed justification for using them during the interview process. There is a detailed explanation for selecting the testing options for the interview process based on observations conducted in the organization.
Interview Questions	25.0%	There are no behavioral or situational questions for the interview process.	The interview process includes both behavioral and situational questions, but they are incomplete or lack details.	The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions.	The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions. The questions relate to the job descriptions developed in previous assignments.	The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions. The questions are well developed and there is a clear connection to the job descriptions developed in previous assignments.
Organization and Effectiveness	20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.	Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity.  There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions.  Techniques of argumentation are evident.   There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing  (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format	5.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Research Citations	5.0%
Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes,  and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	No reference page is included. No citations are used.	Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.	Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.	Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.	In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

Topic 4: Training and Development

Topic 5: Employment Retention and Engagement

HRM-635 Benchmark – Training and Development Week 5 Assignment

Training and development prompts a change within an organization. The goal of training is to identify areas for improvement and develop materials and opportunities to educate employees in order to support growth.

The assessment will develop a small training exercise presented using PPT.

Description

For this assignment, you are required to develop a small training exercise. Review your needs assessment and previous observations conducted on your work environment to help identify one area for improvement that would benefit a part of your organization. This training exercise does not need to be implemented, but should include at least one deliverable that you could use during the training exercise. As you are reviewing your organization, consider employee engagement, systems, procedures, communication, and the culture within the organization. These are suggestions for possible areas that could benefit from a training exercise. The training must include the following:

1. What goal is the organization trying to accomplish?
2. What processes or procedures will change after the training?
3. Describe the strategies or actions involved in the training exercise to meet established goals. What is the expected performance or applications after the training? How will the strategies drive successful business results and improve employee performance?
4. How will the organization provide support to the employees receiving training? To new employees? Does this support consider strengths and weaknesses within the organization?

You are required to develop a written description (1,000 words) including one visual for your training exercise. Be sure to take time to analyze your work surroundings and identify a need for further training and development.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

HRM-635 Benchmark – Training and Development Week 5 Assignment Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HRM-635	HRM-635-O500	Benchmark Assignment – Training and Development	180.0
Criteria	Percentage	Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)	Satisfactory (79.00%)	Good (87.00%)	Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	70.0%
Goal for the Training	10.0%	The training does not include a goal for the organization.	The training includes a goal for the organization, but it is incomplete or lacks details.	The training includes a goal for the organization.	The training includes a detailed goal for the organization and provides reasoning based on observations conducted.	The training includes a detailed goal for the organization and provides thorough research conducted during observations.
Processes and Procedures Implemented After Training	20.0%	The training does not describe new processes and procedures to be implemented.	The training includes new processes and procedures to be implemented, but they are incomplete or lack details.	The training includes new processes and procedures to be implemented after the training.	The training includes detailed processes and procedures to be implemented after the training with an explanation about the changes that will occur.	The training includes detailed processes and procedures to be implemented after the training with an explanation about the changes that will occur. The student addresses the strengths and weaknesses of employees and how to build on employee assets.
Strategies in the Training to Meet Goals and Drive Successful Business Results (MBA SHRM: 5.2)	25.0%	The training does not include strategies to meet organizational goals and drive successful business results.	The training includes strategies to meet organizational goals and drive successful business results, but they are incomplete or lack details.	The training includes strategies to meet organizational goals and drive successful business results.	The training includes detailed strategies to meet organizational goals and drive successful business results. There is an explanation for using the strategies to improve employee performance.	The training includes detailed strategies to meet organizational goals and drive successful business results. There is an explanation for using the strategies to improve employee performance and a connection between organizational goals and the training and development provided.
Visual for Training Exercise	15.0%	The training does not include a visual representation.	The training includes a visual representation, but it is incomplete or lacks details.	The training includes a visual representation.	The training includes a detailed visual representation that supports the training exercise for the organization.	The training includes a detailed visual representation that supports the training exercise for the organization. The visual is well developed and clearly prepares employees for the training.
Organization and Effectiveness	20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Thesis Development and Purpose	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing  (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format	10.0%
Paper Format  (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

Topic 6: Performance Management and Appraisal

Performance Appraisals: Aligning Strategic Goals To People Development

The assignment will require students to act as consultants, evaluate the existing performance management, and propose changes. The paper should be 1000-1250 words.

HRM-635 CLC – Performance Appraisal at Telespazio: Aligning Strategic Goals to People Development – Case Study Week 6 Assignment

Description

This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.

Read the Performance Appraisal at Telespazio: Aligning Strategic Goals to People Development case study located in Topic resources.

Read the Performance Appraisal at Telespazio: Aligning Strategic Goals to People Development case study (located in Topic resources) discussing the assessment of employees within the Telespazio organization.

In 1,000-1,250 words, explain how the organization uses the appraisal assessments to identify employee roles, the current appraisal systems, performance ratings, and Telespazio’s practices for performing appraisal interviews. Decide what changes or strategies could be implemented to current performance appraisal practices. Consider a new performance appraisal tool that would benefit this highly matrixed, global company and an effective method for conducting a performance appraisal interview. Describe the benefits of using both the proposed appraisal tool and appraisal interview during the performance evaluation process. Suggest a minimum of two recommendations to Telespazio leadership which would meet the performance appraisal expectations of fair and realistic criterion, and professional development and motivation of the employees.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite or Turnitin.

Resources:

Read Performance Appraisal at Telespazio: Aligning Strategic Goals to People Development, by Profili, Sammarra, Innocenti, and Gabrielli, from Harvard Business School Press (2013).

HRM-635 CLC – Performance Appraisal at Telespazio: Aligning Strategic Goals to People Development – Case Study Week 6 Assignment Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HRM-635	HRM-635-O501	CLC – Performance Appraisal at Telespazio: Aligning Strategic Goals to People Development – Case Study	80.0
Criteria	Percentage	Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)	Satisfactory (79.00%)	Good (87.00%)	Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	70.0%
Current Appraisal Methods	20.0%	The description does not include the current appraisal method.	The description includes the current appraisal method, but it is incomplete or lacks details.	The description includes the current appraisal method and briefly identifies roles and performance ratings of employees.	The description includes a detailed current appraisal method and identifies roles and performance ratings of employees with at least one example of current practices.	The description includes a comprehensive appraisal method to include all required elements within the assignment with at least one example of current practices.
Changes or Strategies for Telespazio	25.0%	The description does not include changes or strategies for the company.	The description includes some changes or strategies for the company, but they are incomplete or lack details.	The description includes changes or strategies for Telespazio to implement for its performance appraisal practices.	The description includes detailed changes or strategies for Telespazio to implement for its performance appraisal practices and includes at least one example of the change.	The description includes detailed changes or strategies for Telespazio to implement for its performance appraisal practices and includes at least one example of the change.
Appraisal Tool and Appraisal Interview	25.0%	The description does not include appraisal tools or an appraisal interview method.	The description includes either the appraisal tool or the appraisal interview method, but it is incomplete or lacks details.	The description includes mention of both an appraisal tool and an appraisal interview method to include in the performance appraisal practices of the organization.	The description includes detailed suggestions for both an appraisal tool and an appraisal interview method to include in the performance appraisal practices of the organization.	The description includes thorough suggestions for both an appraisal tool and an appraisal interview method to include in the performance appraisal practices of the organization. In addition, the description addresses the benefit of using the appraisal tool and interview method as a part of the performance appraisal practice.
Organization and Effectiveness	20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing  (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format	10.0%
Paper Format  (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

Topic 7: Compensation and Benefits Incentives

Leveraging Human Capital

Students should develop a proposal discussing a plan to motivate workers, rewards and incentives, and performance indicators.

HRM-635 Leveraging Human Capital Week 7 Assignment

Description

Leveraging Human Capital

Throughout this course, you analyzed your current work environment to identify their acquiring, developing, and training practices. Employees are the biggest asset and contribute to the culture and overall performance of the organization. The final part of this project requires you to determine how to leverage on the human capital within your organization. Use the research you have complied throughout this course to determine how to appropriately develop and motivate your employees.

Develop a final written proposal (1,250-1,500 words), discussing performance indicators, rewards and incentives, and a plan for motivating employees. Your proposal must include the following:

1. An evaluation of the current employee status. Describe tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall performance on the job.
2. Develop strategies to encourage employees. How will you reward them for their performance and support them during difficulty?
3. Describe strategies to leverage on employee assets. How will you identify their strengths and use them to better the performance and skills of individual employees?
4. Describe a vision for the overall culture you aspire to develop in your organization.
5. How will you integrate rewards and incentives to remain competitive in your market and appeal to your employees?

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Resources:

Read “Designing and Measuring Human Capital Key Performance Indicators: The Balanced Scorecard Approach,” by Verma, from TATA Consultancy Services.

http://research-innovation.tcs.com/platform-solutions/related-insights/Pages/Designing-Measuring-Human-Capital-Key-Performance-Indicators.aspx

Read “Creating a Smart Compensation Package,” by Massad, located on the Entrepreneur website.

http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/77934

Read “Basic Strategic Pay Policies,” by Joyner, located on the Houston Chronicle website.

http://smallbusiness.chron.com/basic-strategic-pay-policies-35634.html

INSTRUCTIONS FOR STUDENT: Use this to help make sure you covered all the required content, structure, and mechanical expectations.

Content (Student should structure the paper into sections in BOLD below.)

Section 1- Introduction (←Use this header): what the memo is going to be about; it mentions the upcoming sections.

Section 2- Job Performance & Evaluation (←Use this header): An evaluation of the current employee status. Describe tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall performance on the job.

Section 3- Reward & Encouragement Strategies (← Use this header): Develop strategies to encourage employees. How will you reward them for their performance and support them during difficulty?

Section 4- Levering on Employee Strengths (←Use this header): Describe strategies to leverage on employee assets. How will you identify their strengths and use them to better the performance and skills of individual employees?

Section 5- Culture Within the Organization (←Use this header): Describe a vision for the overall culture you aspire to develop in your organization.

Tip: Check out this link https://new.edu/resources/visual-elements-of-organizational-culture

Section 6- Rewards & Incentive to Remain Competitive (← Use this header): How will you integrate rewards and incentives to remain competitive in your market and appeal to your employees?

Section 7- References (←Use this header): has at least 5 peer-reviewed/scholarly references from the databases within the library. The references are also integrated within the paper.

Organization / Development

The 7 required sections are organized separately in sequence as listed in the Content section.

The memo is at least 1250 words in length (excluding references and headers) size 12 Times New Roman font with double spacing text.

Each section is labeled with the header prescribed above.

Mechanics

Formatting or layout and graphics are pleasing to the eye (font, colors, spacing).

Rules of grammar, word usage, punctuation, capitalization, and spelling are followed.

Sentences are complete, clear, varied, and concise with proper syntax.

Used size 12 Times New Roman font for main body text and References.

Used double spacing between sentences and in References section.

HRM-635 Leveraging Human Capital Week 7 Assignment Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
		Leveraging Human Capital	125.0
Criteria	Percentage	Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)	Satisfactory (79.00%)	Good (87.00%)	Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	70.0%
Job Performance Evaluation	15.0%	The written proposal does not include a job performance evaluation.	A job performance is included, but is incomplete or lacks details.	A job performance is included and minimally describes the tasks and performance of employees.	A job performance is included and clearly describes the tasks and performance of employees. There are examples of performance indicators based on observation conducted.	A job performance is well developed and clearly describes the tasks and performance of employees. There are detailed examples of tasks and performance indicators based on observation conducted and how they relate to job performance outcomes.
Reward and Encouragement Strategies	20.0%	The written proposal does not include rewards, incentives, encouragement, or competitive package strategies.	Rewards, incentives, encouragement, and competitive package strategies are included, but are incomplete or lack details.	There is some description of rewards, incentives, and competitive package strategies that support employee performance.	There is a detailed description of rewards, incentives, and competitive package strategies that support employee performance. There are examples of these elements observed within the current organization.	There is a well-developed description of rewards, incentives, and competitive package strategies that support employee performance. There are detailed examples of these elements observed within the current organization and rewards provided for job performance outcomes.
Leveraging on Employee Strengths	20.0%	The written proposal does not include leveraging on human capital.	The written proposal includes a description of leveraging on employee strengths, but the description is incomplete or lacks details.	There is some description of leveraging on employee strengths to improve performance.	There is a detailed description of leveraging on employee strengths to improve performance. There are examples of current practices to leverage on employee strengths observed within the organization.	There is a well-developed description of leveraging on employee strengths to improve performance. There are detailed examples of current practices to leverage on employee strengths observed within the organization and how skills and performance support outcomes.
Culture Within the Organization	15.0%	The written proposal does not include a description of the culture within the organization.	The written proposal includes a description of the culture within the organization, but is incomplete or lacks details.	There is some description of the culture within the organization.	There is a detailed description of the culture within the organization. There are examples included based on the observations conducted within the organization.	There is a well-developed description of the culture within the organization. There are detailed examples included based on the observations conducted within the organization and how the culture contributes to performance outcomes.
Organization and Effectiveness	20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing  (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format	10.0%
Paper Format  (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

HRM-635 Employee Reward System Week 7 Assignment

Description

Throughout this course, you have analyzed your current work environment to identify the acquiring, developing, and training practices. Employees are the biggest asset and contribute to the culture and overall performance of the organization. This project requires you to determine how to leverage the human capital within your organization. Use the research you have complied throughout this course to determine how to appropriately develop and motivate your employees.

Develop a written proposal (1,000-1,250 words), discussing performance indicators, rewards and incentives, and a plan for motivating employees. Your proposal must include the following:

• Describe tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall employee performance on the job.
• How will you identify an employee’s strengths and skills to leverage their performance?
• Develop strategies to improve employee performance. How will you provide employees with rewards and incentives for performance improvement?
• How will you integrate rewards and incentives to remain competitive in the marketplace and recruit and retain the employees?
• Describe a vision for the overall culture you aspire to develop in your organization, relative to the employees being the biggest asset.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. 

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. 

Topic 8: Employment Law and Employee Relations

Benchmark – Organizational And Personal HR Development Plan

In this assignment, students will capture the key findings learned and suggestions to the firm’s leadership team. The paper will be presented in 10-12 slides and follow APA writing guidelines. Students are also advised to refer to the assignment rubric in case they are stuck.

Description

Benchmark Assignment – Organizational and Personal HR Development Plan

Throughout this course, you have had the opportunity to understand the important role human resources has as a strategic business partner and to reflect on the role of HR within your respective organizations. For this presentation, you will be capturing the key findings learned in this course, including making recommendations to your company leadership team.

Create a 10-12 slide PowerPoint presentation, then record your narrated presentation using a screen recording tool such as Loom, Vimeo, or Screencast-O-Matic. Once recorded, place the link to your recorded presentation on the cover slide of your PowerPoint. Submit your PowerPoint presentation with your embedded link.

Your presentation should include the following:

• Develop a synopsis of your outcomes for acquiring, developing, training, and leveraging on human capital within your organization. Examine the pros and cons to the current systems or processes being used.
• Based on the immediate hiring and training needs within the company, how can the company focus on the employees’ current strengths (knowledge, skills, abilities, and experiences) to leverage diversity to improve performance outcomes?
• Propose plans for developing and integrating the positions of HR specialist or generalist, HR leadership, HR consultant, or HR of One within the organization.
• What recommendations would you make to the leadership of your company relative to making sound decisions when acquiring, developing, and leveraging resources (i.e., human talent, technology, knowledge management) to meet organizational needs while staying legally compliant with employment practices?
• Based on the knowledge gained in this course, how will you apply what has been learned into your organization? As a human resource professional, describe the elements of your personal development plan within the field of HR.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

HRM-635 Synopsis on Human Resource Management Week 8 Assignment

Description

For this assignment, review the feedback you received from your instructor on each submission developed during this course. Develop a synopsis of your outcomes for acquiring, developing, training, and leveraging on human capital within your organization. You are not required to submit each assignment again, but you are required to evaluate your assignment, the feedback you received, and develop a synopsis of your take-away from the process. Integrate any plans for preparing for a position as an HR specialist or manager within an organization.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

Rubric

Collapse All RubricCollapse All

collapse Synopsis of Outcomes assessment

Synopsis of Outcomes

7.5 points

Criteria Description

Synopsis of Outcomes

5. Excellent

7.5 points

There is a comprehensive synopsis of the outcomes for acquiring, developing, training, and leveraging on human capital within the organization. There is a clear examination of the pros and cons to the current systems or processes being used.

4. Good

6.53 points

Synopsis of outcomes for acquiring, developing, training, and leveraging on human capital within the organization has adequate detail. There is a clear examination of the pros and cons to the current systems or processes being used.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Synopsis of outcomes for acquiring, developing, training, and leveraging on human capital within the organization has minimal detail. There is a simple examination of the pros and cons to the current systems or processes being used.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.55 points

Synopsis of outcomes for acquiring, developing, training, and leveraging on human capital within the organization lacks details. There is a vague examination of the pros and cons to the current systems or processes being used.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Synopsis of outcomes is not included.

collapse Employee’s Current Strengths (B) assessment

Employee’s Current Strengths (B)

15 points

Criteria Description

Employee’s Current Strengths (C 2.2)

5. Excellent

15 points

There is a detailed explanation of how the company can focus on the employee’s current strengths to leverage diversity to improve performance outcomes.

4. Good

13.05 points

There is a minimally detailed explanation of how the company can focus on the employee’s current strengths to leverage diversity to improve performance outcomes.

3. Satisfactory

11.85 points

There is a thorough explanation of how the company can focus on the employee’s current strengths to leverage diversity to improve performance outcomes.

2. Less than Satisfactory

11.1 points

There is a vague explanation of how the company can focus on the employee’s current strengths to leverage diversity to improve performance outcomes.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

There is no explanation of how the company can focus on the employee’s current strengths to leverage diversity to improve performance outcomes.

collapse Proposed Plans assessment

Proposed Plans

7.5 points

Criteria Description

Proposed Plans

5. Excellent

7.5 points

Proposed plans for developing and integrating the different HR positions are detailed and thorough.

4. Good

6.53 points

Proposed plans for developing and integrating the different HR positions are complete and comprehensible.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Proposed plans for developing and integrating the different HR positions are somewhat comprehensible.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.55 points

Proposed plans for developing and integrating the different HR positions are incomplete or incomprehensive.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

There is no mention of proposed plans for developing and integrating the different HR positions.

collapse Recommendations to the Leadership (B) assessment

Recommendations to the Leadership (B)

15 points

Criteria Description

Recommendations to the Leadership (C. 2.3)

5. Excellent

15 points

The recommendations for the leadership of the company relative to making sound decisions to meet organizational needs while staying legally compliant with employment practices are substantial.

4. Good

13.05 points

The recommendations for the leadership of the company relative to making sound decisions to meet organizational needs while staying legally compliant with employment practices are relevant.

3. Satisfactory

11.85 points

The recommendations for the leadership of the company relative to making sound decisions to meet organizational needs while staying legally compliant with employment practices are overly simplistic.

2. Less than Satisfactory

11.1 points

The recommendations for the leadership of the company relative to making sound decisions to meet organizational needs while staying legally compliant with employment practices are irrelevant.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

There is no mention of recommendations for the leadership team.

collapse Application of Knowledge Gained assessment

Application of Knowledge Gained

7.5 points

Criteria Description

Application of Knowledge Gained

5. Excellent

7.5 points

The discussion of how the knowledge gained from this course will be applied in the organization is clear and insightful.

4. Good

6.53 points

The discussion of how the knowledge gained from this course will be applied in the organization is detailed and descriptive.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

The discussion of how the knowledge gained from this course will be applied in the organization is ambiguous.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.55 points

The discussion of how the knowledge gained from this course will be applied in the organization is insufficient.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

There is no discussion of how the knowledge gained from this course will be applied in the organization.

collapse Professionalism assessment

Professionalism

7.5 points

Criteria Description

Professionalism

5. Excellent

7.5 points

Appearance and manner exhibit appropriate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment totally free of distraction.

4. Good

6.53 points

Appearance and manner exhibit adequate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment relatively free of distraction.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Appearance or manner within the video are lacking some degree of professionalism; or the video includes some distraction in the environment or background.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.55 points

Appearance or manner within the video is unprofessional; or the video is taken within a distracting environment or background.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Not addressed.

collapse Presentation of Content assessment

Presentation of Content

45 points

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content

5. Excellent

45 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Good

39.15 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Presentation includes persuasive information from reliable sources.

3. Satisfactory

35.55 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

2. Less than Satisfactory

33.3 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Presentation includes some persuasive information.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Presentation includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

collapse Layout assessment

Layout

15 points

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Excellent

15 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

4. Good

13.05 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

3. Satisfactory

11.85 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

2. Less than Satisfactory

11.1 points

The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

collapse Language Use and Audience Awareness assessment

Language Use and Audience Awareness

15 points

Criteria Description

Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.

5. Excellent

15 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

4. Good

13.05 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

3. Satisfactory

11.85 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Less than Satisfactory

11.1 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

collapse Mechanics of Writing assessment

Mechanics of Writing

7.5 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.

5. Excellent

7.5 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

6.53 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.55 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

collapse Documentation of Sources assessment

Documentation of Sources

7.5 points

Criteria Description

Includes citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc. as appropriate to assignment and style.

5. Excellent

7.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good

6.53 points

Sources are documented as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Sources are documented as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.55 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

• Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
• Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
• Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
• Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
• Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
• Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!