Community-based participatory research (CBPR) offers a different approach Custom Essay

Consider how CBPR may contribute to positive health outcomes in populations. Consider a community of interest and reflect on how CBPR may apply to this community. A description of Hepatitis in South East Washington DC. Identify one principle of CBPR that can be applied to South East Washington DC. selected and explain how this principle can inform interventions to alleviate health disparities for South East Washington DC. Be specific and provide examples. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) offers a different approach. Community members serve as partners, rather than subjects, and are active participants in the planning and development of interventions and/or research projects. Through an equitable partnership with academia and researchers, community members serve as experts throughout various phases of the research process, contributing their knowledge about health problems in the community and effective interventions to improve health outcomes. Additionally, community members can also assist researchers in informing the community about the purpose of the research and intended outcomes to secure trust, communication, and community participation. APA style. References Coreil, J. (Ed.). (2009). Social and behavioral foundations of public health (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Chapter 14, “Community-Based Approaches to Health Promotion” Battaglia, T., Murrell, S. S., Bhosrekar, S. G., Caron, S. E., Bowen, D. J., Smith, E.,…Rorie, J.-A. (2012). Connecting Boston’s public housing developments to community health centers: Who’s Ready for Change? Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 6(3), 239–248. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. Boutin-Foster, C., Scott, E., Melendez, J., Rodriguez, A., Ramos, R., Kanna, B., & Michelen, W. (2013). Ethical considerations for conducting health disparities research in community health centers: A socio-ecological perspective. American Journal of Public Health, 103(12), 2179–2184. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. Eder, M., Tobin, J. N., Proser, M., & Shin, P. (2012). Special issue introduction: Building a stronger science of community-engaged research. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 6(3), 227–230. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. Ford, M., Wahlquist, M., Blake, R., Green, C., Streets, J., Fuller, E.,…Garrett-Mayer, E. (2012). Assessing an intervention to improve clinical trial perceptions among predominately African-American communities in South Carolina. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 6(3), 249–263. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. Hicks, S., Duran, B., Wallerstein, N., Avila, M., Belone, L., Lucero, J.,…White Hat, E. (2012). Evaluating community-based participatory research to improve community-partnered science and community health. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 6(3), 289–299. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. Letiecq, B., & Schmalzbauer, L. (2012). Community-based participatory research with Mexican migrants in a new rural destination: A good fit? Action Research, 10(3), 244–259. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. Document: Socio-Ecological Model Table (Word document) Optional Resources Mabachi, N. M., & Kimminau, K. S. (2012). Leveraging community-academic partnerships to improve healthy food access in an urban, Kansas City, Kansas, community. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 6(3), 279–288. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. McKee, M., Thew, D., Starr, M., Kushalnagar, P., Reid, J. T., Graybill, P.,…Pearson, T. (2012). Engaging the Deaf American Sign Language community: Lessons from a community-based participatory research center. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 6(3), 321–329. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. Proser, M. (2012). Beyond the manuscript. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 6(3), 301–310. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

Is this the question you were looking for? If so, place your order here to get started!